Skip to Main Content
Beta

Help us to improve this service by completing our feedback survey (opens in new tab).

Mark Stalker v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

[2024] UKFTT 552 (GRC)

NCN: [2024] UKFTT 00552 (GRC)

Case Reference: D/2024/0058

First-tier Tribunal
General Regulatory Chamber

Transport

Determined on the

Papers on 19th June 2024

Before

HHJ DAVID DIXON

Between

MARK STALKER

Appellant

and

THE REGISTRAR OF APPROVED

DRIVING INSTRUCTORS

Respondent

Decision: The appeal is withdrawn.

REASONS

Background to Appeal

1.

This appeal concerns a decision of the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors (“the Registrar”) made 29th December 2023 to refuse to grant the Appellant a third trainee licence.

2.

The Appellant was a trainee driving instructor who was granted a trainee licence under s.129 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (Footnote: 1) (‘the Act’) for a six-month period, and then another, but was refused a further licence at the end of the relevant period.

3.

The Registrar’s reasons for refusal, in summary, were that the Appellant had not passed the final part of the ADI qualifying examination within the relevant period and as insufficient evidence of loss of training time was supplied that the Appellant had had long enough to progress, and the application to issue a third trainee licence was therefore refused.

4.

The Appellant initially appealed the Registrar’s decision, however by email on 18th June 2024 the Appellant indicated that he had been successful in his recent Part 3 examination and therefore was now fully qualified. He no longer required a further licence and the application was therefore withdrawn.

5.

The Tribunal agreed the request to withdraw and wishes the Appellant well in his qualified status.

(Signed)

HHJ David Dixon

DATE: 19th June 2024

Mark Stalker v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

[2024] UKFTT 552 (GRC)

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (111.8 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.