Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

140 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • AT v SS High Court (Family Division) [2015] EWHC 2703 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    ...father, AT for the summary return of S to Holland pursuant...

    ...progress. The mother opposes the return of S to the Netherlands... ...to decide to order his return.

    ...that to order the summary return of S to Holland would... ...discretion to refuse such a return. Whilst the dispute in...

    ...of the mother’s continued refusal to co-operate with the...

  • HB v A Local Authority & Anor (Wardship - Costs Funding Order) High Court (Family Division) [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam) Case No: FD16P000415 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 21/03/2017 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD HB -and- A Local Authority -and- The Local Government Association Applicant Respondent

  • A v R High Court (Family Division) [2020] EWFC 87 Matching text sample:

    NEUTRAL CITATION No [2020] EWFC 87 Case No: ZW19P01451 IN THE WEST LONDON FAMILY COURT BETWEEN: A Applicant - and - R Respondent JUDGMENT dated 20 JULY 2020: HHJ CORBETT sitting as a section 9(1) Deputy Judge of the High Court FINAL HEARING 24 JUNE 2020 Introduction D’s father (F) issued an application under the Children Act 1989 in order to seek court orders regulating how and when he might see the parties’ son D. This is my Judgment following the listed final hearing on 24 June 2020. I apologise for the delay in sending this judgment to the parties, I can only attribute this to the volume of work during the current CV19 pandemic. In this Judgment I will concentrate on those parts of the evidence and submissions which have assisted me to make decisions about D, it is by no means a full account of all that I have read in the bundle nor heard in submissions. I can assure the parties that I have taken account of all of the written and oral material made available to me. I will...

  • Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2011] EWCA Civ 361 Matching text sample:

    Case No: B4/2010/2832 and B4/2010/2901 Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWCA Civ 361 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION PRINCIPAL REGISTRY The Honourable Mrs Justice Pauffley FD10P02270 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 01/04/2011 Before : THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD JUSTICE THORPE THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD JUSTICE AIKENS and THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LADY JUSTICE BLACK

  • LB v LB High Court (Family Division) [2020] EWHC 3840 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 3840 (Fam) Case No: SD19C01384 IN THE FAMILY COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/11/2020 Before : Mr Justice Williams - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: A County Council Applicant - and - Mother Respondent and

  • GK v HX High Court (Family Division) [2024] EWHC 3463 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    for a summary return order under the 1980 Hague...

    ...5 July 2024 seeking summary return of F to Australia.... ...mother resists F’s summary return on the grounds set out...

    ...a grave risk that his return would expose the child to...

    ...confirming that she would not return to Australia. The hearing... ...of securing the child’s return to Australia.

  • R v P High Court (Family Division) [2017] EWHC 1804 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    This judgment was delivered in private.   The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published.  The judgment, the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved.   All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with.   Failure to do so will be a contempt of court. No: FD16P00608 Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 1804 (Fam) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice 3 rd March 2017 Before: MRS. JUSTICE THEIS ( In Private ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B E T W E E N : R

  • London Borough of Haringey v T (1996 Hague Convention Art 7) Family Court [2024] EWFC 151 Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWFC 151 Case No: ZW22C50446 IN THE FAMILY COURT SITTING AT THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 28/06/2024 Before : MR JUSTICE MACDONALD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY Applicant - and – N First Respondent

  • T (Father) v G (Mother) High Court (Family Division) [2024] EWHC 246 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media and legal bloggers, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so may be a contempt of court. Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 246 (Fam) Case No: FD23P00338 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 9 February 2024 Before : MR JUSTICE PEEL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : T (Father) Applicant - and - G (Mother)

  • JC v DF High Court (Family Division) [2022] EWHC 3546 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    ...in England and did not return to Portugal, save for...

    ...must decide whether a summary return order should be made forthwith... ...the end of July 2022. Return can be subject to limited...

    R v K (Abduction: Return Order)

    ...would stay in England or return to Portugal. If at...