Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

126 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • A McDermott v Sellafield Ltd & Ors. Employment Appeal Tribunal [2023] EAT 60 Matching text sample:

    [2023] EAT 60

    ...the second respondent could not, as alleged, have been liable... ...the first respondent was acting as its agent and with its...

    ...act or a protected disclosure as alleged. In any event...

    ...will refer to the parties as they were in the employment... tribunal, as claimant and respondents. The... ...the tribunal’s decisions, are as follows.
  • Adrian Hyde & Anor v Myck Djurberg & Ors High Court (Insolvency and Companies List) [2024] EWHC 1188 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge...

    (as Trustees in Bankruptcy of the...

    ...in this case. They are as follows:

    ...witness statements to be admitted as hearsay evidence, but no...
  • X v Y Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 42 (B) Matching text sample:

    Neutral citation: [2024] EWFC 42 (B) X v Y ZW22P00438 Final hearing 15-17 January 2024 The Parties and Representation This judgment is delivered at the end of a 3 day final hearing listed at the west London family court. The parties are: X the father; Y the mother; and the child, A (a boy aged 6) represented through his r16.4 Guardian (CG). The Father has been represented by Counsel Ms Gillan. The Children’s Guardian has been represented by Counsel Ms Haworth. The Mother has appeared in person, assisted by a McKenzie Friend. Over 3 days I heard evidence from: The Mother; The Father; CG (twice, once at the start of the hearing and also at the end considering some of the matters that were given in evidence), and Z, the Mother’s husband. I read a Bundle of documents which included evidence of Dr B dated 22 November 2023 a Chartered Psychologist and Cognitive and Behavioural Psychotherapist instructed by the r16.4 Guardian to give expert evidence. The Conduct of the Hearing It must be...
  • Everyday Wholesale Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2023] UKFTT 60 (TC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKFTT 00060 (TC)

    ...relevant to the substantive appeal as showing that the appellant knew...

    ...against some of the assessments as being out of time....

    ...appeal. There is no challenge as regards the authenticity or contemporaneity...
  • Everyday Wholesale Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2023] UKFTT 78 (TC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKFTT 00078 (TC)

    ...relevant to the substantive appeal as showing that the appellant knew...

    ...against some of the assessments as being out of time....

    ...appeal. There is no challenge as regards the authenticity or contemporaneity...
  • His Majesty's Solicitor General v Jason-Steven: Wong High Court (Family Division) [2023] EWHC 2966 (Fam) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 2966 (Fam)

    [2023] EWHC 2684 (Fam)

    As I have earlier said,...

    ...above) at [40]). As Laws LJ further observed in...
  • Abdel-Kader & Ors v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea & Ors High Court (Queen's Bench Division) [2022] EWHC 2006 (QB) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation Number: [2022] EWHC 2006 (QB) Case Nos: QB-2020-004666 and ors as listed in Annex 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION GRENFELL TOWER LITIGATION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 28/07/2022 Before : SENIOR MASTER FONTAINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Abdel-Kader and ors Atmani and ors Talabi and ors De Costa and ors
  • LKV Ivica Ltd v Director of Border Revenue First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2024] UKFTT 341 (TC) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation: [2024] UKFTT 00341 (TC) Case Number: TC09145 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL TAX CHAMBER [Taylor House] Appeal reference: TC/2022/02181 RESTORATION – trailer adapted to conceal goods and seized as liable to forfeiture - no condemnation proceedings and no challenge to legality of seizure therefore trailer (and goods) deemed as forfeit – the deeming provisions in Schedule 3 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 - Jones and Race considered and applied - whether review reasonable – yes – whether hardship considered – yes - Appeal dismissed Heard on: 27 April 2023 & 28 March 2024 Judgment date: 25 April 2024 Before JUDGE NATSAI MANYARARA GILL HUNTER Between LKV IVICA LTD Appellant and
  • Bronte Brown & Anor v Cosmin Sestras & Ors High Court (King's Bench Division) [2023] EWHC 1220 (KB) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 1220 (KB)

    (sitting as a deputy high court judge...

    ...(who I will refer to as the claimant for the balance... ...Leigh Graham all identified this as a black Mercedes Benz vehicle... (and provided other information as to its identity). That...

    ...first defendant been correctly identified as involved in the accident?
  • ABFA Commodities Trading Limited v Petraco Oil Company SA High Court (Commercial Court) [2024] EWHC 147 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...refer to in this judgment as

    ...it also sought an inquiry as to damages pursuant to the... ...damages offered by VTB Commodities as a condition for obtaining the...

    ...the issues which arise are as follows.

    but raises no issue as to whether and when property...
Complete our short survey