Search results
Results listing
-
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Asustek Computer Incorporation & Ors
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2017] EWCA Civ 1526
Matching text sample:
...issues of construction of a patent cross-licensing agreement containing a... ...HTC’s acts of alleged patent infringement complained of by Philips... ...of a preliminary issue in patent infringement proceedings brought by Philips...
...against licensees of Qualcomm any patent of Philips which is or...
...under the latter's CDMA patent portfolio in order to do...
...was apparently attributed to Philips' patent portfolio. Philips considered that... ...should be excluded because the patent positions between Qualcomm and Philips...
-
International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller General of Patents
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2013] EWHC 807 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...is an appeal concerning two patent applications in the name of... ...the inventions disclosed in the patent applications were excluded from patentability...
to reject the patent applications. At the time...
...and seeks to harmonise national patent laws concerning biotechnological inventions....
Whereas patent law must be applied so... ...criteria of patentability proper to patent law, whereby a mere...
-
Kennametal Inc v Pramet Tools Sro & Anor
High Court (Patents Court)
[2014] EWHC 1438 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...the claimant to amend the patent in the European Patent Office. The claimant offered...
...for limitation of the granted patent was made centrally in the... ...new method claims into the patent, which would be regarded...
...this court, holding that the patent as granted is invalid,...
...finally decided that the European patent (UK), which takes... effect as a UK patent, is invalid. The question... ...serve to validate the European Patent (UK) as well as... ...States in which the European patent is designated. In any...
-
Ivax Pharmaceuticals (UK) Ltd v Astrazeneca AB
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2004] EWHC 1264 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
This is a Patent action between two pharmaceutical companies... ...of asthma (“the 371 Patent”); the other (“... the 993 patent”) is for the same... ...obstructive pulmonary disease. The 371 patent was granted on 6 ...(unless revoked); the 993 patent was granted on the 14 ...opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office (“EPO”)....
...the EPO is inevitable as patent rights, both under the...
...EPO to amendments to the patent was more “indulgent” (...
...the fact that a similar patent held by Glaxo was revoked...
-
Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd & Ors
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2015] EWHC 3837 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...from my judgment in this patent trial, which has been...
...what can be called conventional patent questions. The defendants, Huawei...
...trials, each dealing with one patent (or sometimes divisional patents... ...is in effect a conventional patent case. Then the competition...
...cases are in effect conventional patent infringement actions, albeit that...
-
Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Ors
High Court (Patents Court)
[2018] EWHC 808 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...validity is determined in the Patent Re-examination Board, and... ...proceedings against Conversant in the Patent Re-Examination Board, challenging...
...validity of a non-European patent was in issue was not...
...in which the issue of patent validity was raised, including...
...dealing with sales in non-patent countries. So if the...
-
Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK Ltd & Anor
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2011] EWCA Civ 1337
Matching text sample:
...We decided that Schütz’s patent was valid and had been...
...was not registered with the Patent Office within six months of...
...and documents filed on [the patent in suit].
...an exclusive licensee of a patent and the patent is subsequently infringed
-
R2 Semiconductor Inc. v Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd & Anor
High Court (Patents Court)
[2023] EWHC 1550 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...is the proprietor of a patent (the “Patent”). The subject-matter... of the Patent is on-chip power supplies... ...the Defendants have infringed the Patent. The Defendants have counterclaimed... for revocation of the Patent. On 30 January 2023,...
The claims in the Patent
The Patent seeks to deal with this...
Claim 1 in the Patent is as follows:
-
Special Effects Ltd v L'Oréal SA L'Oréal (UK) Ltd
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2006] EWHC 481 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...opposed the grant of a patent in the Opposition Division of... the European Patent Office. The patent was issued. Subsequently the... ...on the ground that the patent was invalid for the reasons...
...namely for infringement of the patent, was not the same... ...the EPO, namely whether the patent should be maintained or revoked...
“Once granted, the patent becomes a patent of the chosen contracting state... ...any decision of the European Patent Office does not preclude the...
...Opposition Division of the European Patent Office, must finally and... ...decide the validity of the patent. That it did not... ...Opposition Division of the European Patent Office.
-
JC Bamford Excavators Limited v Manitou UK Limited & Anor.
High Court (Patents Court)
[2022] EWHC 1724 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...is the owner of European Patent Nos. 1 532 065... ...“EP 382”) and UK Patent No. GB 2 390...
...“the key point of the patent is that it is automating...
...inventive concept embodied in the patent in suit.
...known or used. The European Patent Convention uses the words ‘...