Search results
Results listing
-
Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Anor
High Court (Patents Court)
[2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...technical expert evidence from Prof Kennedy (called by Convatec) and...
...& Nephew said that Prof Kennedy’s evidence lacked objectivity,...
As for Prof Kennedy’s complexion, I did...
...compared to that of Prof Kennedy meant that on questions relating... ...prefer the evidence of Prof Kennedy. I would not go... ...I do acknowledge that Prof Kennedy has a much more extensive...
-
Ian Clifford v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
Employment Appeal Tribunal
[2024] EAT 90
Matching text sample:
CONOR KENNEDY
...indirect discrimination), as Mr Kennedy clarified during the hearing that...
...a “bold” submission, Mr Kennedy argued that the EAT was...
.... In the alternative, Mr Kennedy contended that
-
Brooks, R (on the application of) v Parole Board
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2004] EWCA Civ 80
Matching text sample:
LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY
Lord Justice Kennedy:
...procedural events set out by Kennedy LJ. There is only...
...said has been quoted by Kennedy LJ in paragraph 22 above...
-
Tahir v Faizi
High Court (Queen's Bench Division)
[2019] EWHC 1627 (QB)
Matching text sample:
Mr Conor Kennedy
...was represented by Mr Conor Kennedy, each of Mr Wilcox... and Mr Kennedy also representing his client at...
...of Mr Wilcox and Mr Kennedy in relation to two questions...
...first ground of appeal, Mr Kennedy focused on the relative weakness...
-
Halton Borough Council, R (on the application of) v Road User Charging Adjudicators
High Court (Administrative Court)
[2023] EWHC 303 (Admin)
Matching text sample:
...wins. First, before Adjudicator Kennedy in a Determination dated 11... ...Chief Adjudicator Sheppard and Adjudicator Kennedy (“the Adjudicators”) in...
...(23.5.19). Adjudicator Kennedy dealt with the Case 1...
Adjudicator Kennedy directed the cancellation of the... ...staff but by Emovis. Adjudicator Kennedy concluded that Regulation 8(9...
Adjudicator Kennedy also found in Mr Curzon...
-
Crown Prosecution Service v Chalupa
High Court (Administrative Court)
[2009] EWHC 3082 (Admin)
Matching text sample:
Kennedy vs DPP 2002 EWHC Admin...
...The Divisional court (Lord Justice Kennedy and Mr Justice Pitchers)... ...the European Convention. Lord Justice Kennedy, giving the judgment of...
...thereafter. Second, Lord Justice Kennedy distinguished between the case where... .... Fourth, although Lord Justice Kennedy indicated that suspect should be...
...the dictum of Lord Justice Kennedy in the
-
Wayne Allard v Govia Thameslink Railway Limited
High Court (King's Bench Division)
[2024] EWHC 2227 (KB)
Matching text sample:
Conor Kennedy
Both Mr Kennedy and Ms Allen make the... ...as it stands. In Mr Kennedy’s case, he says...
...do not find either Mr Kennedy’s primary submission or Ms...
...a limited kind in Mr Kennedy having believed that that special... ...see why this confirmed Mr Kennedy’s impression that the damages...
-
Barkshire & Ors, R. v
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
[2011] EWCA Crim 1885
Matching text sample:
...was a police officer, PC Kennedy. Under the assumed name,...
Kennedy was not authorised to take...
"UCO133 (that is Kennedy) will decline the offer...
By 2009 Kennedy, apparently convincingly, purported to...
-
Wilkin-Shaw v Fuller & Anor
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2013] EWCA Civ 410
Matching text sample:
...been expected. On arrival Charlotte Kennedy, who had assumed the... ...not there. He told Charlotte Kennedy that Miss Timms and Mr...
Following the call from Charlotte Kennedy, the first defendant telephoned... ...attempted unsuccessfully to telephone Charlotte Kennedy and instead telephoned another member... ...he had given to Charlotte Kennedy.
...first defendant was from Charlotte Kennedy's telephone; but the...
...be pulled out by Charlotte Kennedy.
-
Customs & Excise, R (on the application of) v Nottingham Magistrates' Court
High Court (Administrative Court)
[2004] EWHC 1922 (Admin)
Matching text sample:
LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY
LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY: I agree.
LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY: Yes.
LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY: Yes, and of course...