Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,537 documents found

Results listing

  • Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK High Court (Patents Court) [2009] EWHC 131 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...first, Shutz sues Werit for patent infringement. In the second,... Shutz sues Delta for patent infringement, trade mark infringement...

    ...Werit and Delta amount to patent infringement and, in the...

    ...to a stay of the patent claim in the Delta proceedings...

    ...actions. Shutz proposes that the patent, trade mark and passing...

  • Hospira UK Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Novartis AG Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2013] EWCA Civ 1663 Matching text sample:

    ...patented invention to priority. The patent in suit, European Patent (UK) 1 296 689...

    ...amongst other documents, United States Patent Application No 267689, referred... ...priority documents identified in the patent in suit. The issue,... ...of claim 7 of the patent.

    ...Mylan) for revocation of the patent. Both companies wish to... ...Arnold J decided that the patent in suit and another related... patent were wholly invalid. His... ...that claim 7 of the patent in suit was not entitled...

    ...Article 87 of the European Patent Convention (“the Convention”)...

  • Eli Lilly & Company Ltd v Neopharma Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2011] EWHC 1852 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...Neolab) for infringement of European Patent UK 0454436. The patent relates to olanzapine and has... ...the attacks made on the patent of obviousness,

    ...second unsuccessful attack on the patent in this jurisdiction.

    ...and for which the basic patent is the patent in suit, comes to... ...have to establish that the patent is invalid.

    ...upholding the validity of the patent in December 2009. That...

  • W L Gore & Associates GmbH v Geox SPA Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2009] EWCA Civ 794 Matching text sample:

    ...not an infringement of the patent.

    The Judge summarised this patent and its teaching at [...

    ...with nothing really in the patent to support it. Mr...

    ...ignored the teaching of the patent which he submitted is to...

  • Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc & Anor v Teva UK Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2005] EWHC 2141 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...for the infringement of European Patent (UK) 0 835 657... . The patent stands in the name of... ...licensee in respect of the patent in the United Kingdom,...

    ...infringement, and allege that the patent is invalid upon two principal...

    European Patent 0 835 657 claims priority...

    ...that the reader of this patent is taught to devise such...

  • Wobben Properties GmbH v Siemens Plc & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2015] EWHC 2114 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The patent

    ...The claimant (Wobben) holds patent EP (UK) 0 847... ...Wind Power Station”. The patent claims priority from a German... September 1995. The patent was granted on 9 ...the defendants have infringed the patent by installing wind turbines in...

    ...infringement and contends that the patent is invalid.

    ...authentic text of the UK patent is German. There is...

  • Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt Des Offentlichen Rechts v JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. & Anor (Rev 2) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2010] EWCA Civ 390 Matching text sample:

    ...to deal with the UK patent and that, by Article...

    ...that where infringement of a patent and the validity of a... patent were raised in proceedings,... ...on the validity of a patent would directly impinge on the...

    ...allegation of infringement of a patent and a defence of invalidity... of the patent for the purposes of Article... ...in which the claimant alleged patent infringement by the defendants and... ...the defendants alleged that the patent was invalid if the alleged... ...of the claim to a patent, for the purposes of... ...with the validity of the patent, which in that case... was a UK patent.

    ...infringement and validity of a patent were raised. They are...

  • Glaxosmithkline UK Ltd v Department of Health High Court (Commercial Court) [2007] EWHC 1470 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...unbranded copies of out-of-patent products) were excluded from... ...copies of an out-of-patent product but bear a brand...

    ...a branded product goes off-patent, it is liable to... ...able to command whilst on patent.

    ...a branded product goes off-patent, therefore, branded manufacturers have...

    ...go or had gone off-patent, in order to compete... ...made anyway because an off-patent product was becoming subject to...

  • Conductive Inkjet Technology Ltd v Uni -Pixel Displays Inc High Court (Chancery Division) [2013] EWHC 2968 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    The Patent applications

    ...UPD applied for a European Patent claiming priority from the 055... ...), and for a Korean patent also claiming priority from the...

    ...UPD applied for a European Patent claiming priority from the 882...

    ...are now the two European Patent applications. CIT relies on...

  • VIIV Healthcare UK Ltd v Teva UK Ltd High Court (Chancery Division) [2015] EWHC 1074 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...EP (UK) 0817637 (the Patent), which was applied for... ...of claim 1 of the Patent.

    ...within claim 1 of the Patent. However, this triple combination... ...by claim 3 of the Patent, which is in these...

    ...years of filing of the Patent and, accordingly, an SPC...

    ...addition, an order revoking the patent upon which the SPC is...