Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,537 documents found

Results listing

  • Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2004] EWCA Civ 1021 Matching text sample:

    ...’. He held that the patent was valid.

    ...the key claim of the patent, claim 20.

    ...forth those paragraphs of the patent forming the basis of the...

    Next the patent describes some general advantages of...

  • Cephalon Inc & Ors v Orchid Europe Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2011] EWHC 1591 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...698 for present purposes. The patent describes the invention at [...

    ...all the experiments in the patent the particle size is measured... ...the bulk drug substance. The patent explains at [0011] that...

    The patent tracks the historical development of... ...than the early lots. The patent explains at [0028]:

    ...measurement methods described in the patent.

  • Secretary of State for Education and Skills v Frontline Technology Ltd High Court (Chancery Division) [2004] EWHC 1487 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...for the revocation of European patent (UK) No. 0.... ...name of the defendant (the patent in suit). The patent in suit is entitled “... ...on the validity of the patent in suit is founded both...

    BACKGROUND TO THE PATENT IN SUIT

    ...are referred to in the patent in suit. First, a...

    THE PATENT IN SUIT

  • Mexichem UK Ltd v Honeywell International Inc Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2020] EWCA Civ 473 Matching text sample:

    ...at least four other divisional patent applications in the pipeline undergoing... examination in the European Patent Office. In order to...

    ...By that date a Japanese patent application number H41-10388 (...

    ...to apply established principles of patent law to decide whether the...

    ...clear the distinction in the patent system between instances where a...

  • Baxter Healthcare SA & Ors v Bayer Corp & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 1890 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...-infringement and to revoke European patent UK number 0764 447.... ...The subject matter of the patent is intravenously injectable immunoglobulin,...

    The patent claims a priority date of... ...10th September 1996 and the patent granted on 2nd January 2004...

    ...the UK designation of the patent, and a few days...

    ...either the EPO decides the patent is invalid or the Belgian...

  • Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The Patent

    ...the registered proprietor of European Patent (UK) No. 2... ...is a mistranslation) (“the Patent”). The Second Part... ...the exclusive licensee under the Patent. The Defendant and the... ...“Jarden”) has infringed the Patent by importing and selling a...

    ...infringement and claims that the Patent should be revoked on the...

    German Patent Application No. 2 102...

  • Oxford University Innovation Limited v Oxford Nanoimaging Limited High Court (Patents Court) [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...as the “First and Second Patent Families”.

    ...owned the First and Second Patent Families (and other intellectual...

    ...on the First and Second Patent Families but the Licence is...

    ...vest the First and Second Patent Families in the University....

  • Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2013] EWCA Civ 924 Matching text sample:

    European Patent (UK) No. 0... 347 066 (“the Patent”) and its foreign counterparts... ...including in this country. The Patent is now the subject of... ...(“the SPC”). The Patent and SPC relate to escitalopram... ...depression. The proprietor of the Patent is H. Lundbeck A/... ...The UK counterpart of the Patent was ultimately held valid in... ...relying on invalidity of the Patent, claiming that it has... ...challenging the validity of the Patent or the SPC. Lundbeck...

    ...on the ground that the Patent is invalid

    ...Tabatznik took charge of major patent matters affecting companies within the... ...Group’s Head of European Patent Litigation.

    ...batches were destroyed and the patent applications and patents allowed to...

  • University of Queensland CSL Ltd & Anor v Comptroller -General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 223 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...absence of Community harmonisation of patent law, what is meant... ...is protected by a basic patent in force’ and what...

    ...is protected by a basic patent’ according to Article 3(...

    ...antigens ‘protected by a basic patent’ if one antigen of... ...is ‘protected by the basic patent in force’?

    ...is protected by a basic patent’ according to Article 3(... a) that the basic patent is one of a family... ...based on the same original patent application and comprising a parent... patent and two divisional patents which...

  • Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2009] EWCA Civ 1328 Matching text sample:

    Patent and Designs Act 1907

    ...the old law no UK patent infringement by sale and despatch...

    ...public register is or the patent is registered, have exclusive... ...for infringement of a US patent were brought against a person... ...challenge the validity of the patent. Yet the ECJ has... ...A for an infringement of patent in Member State B at...

    ...overrode Art. 2 in a patent infringement action where validity is...