Search results
Results listing
-
S v A
High Court (Family Division)
[2022] EWHC 2300 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
Neutral Citation Number: [2022] EWHC 2300 (Fam) Case No: FD21P00817 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Before : Mr Paul Hopkins QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S -and- A Date: 07/09/2022
-
JWK v DAW
High Court (Family Division)
[2022] EWHC 2597 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
This is the approved version of the judgment. It was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for it to be reported. No person is to be identified by name or location and the anonymity of the parties and their children is to be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court. Case No: FD22P00284 Neutral Citation: [2022] EWHC 2597 (Fam) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Before : Mr Paul Hopkins QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : J.W.K. Applicant - and - D.A.W Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Miriam Best for the Applicant
-
G v G
United Kingdom Supreme Court
[2021] UKSC 9
Matching text sample:
”). In opposing a return order, the mother relies... ...) (grave risk to the child) and 13(2) (child’s own objections) of...
...refoulement, that is expulsion or return to a country where they... ...persecuted, and the requirement to return a child under the 1980...
...not years, will frustrate the return of children under the 1980...
...In re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal)
-
In the matter of C (Children)
United Kingdom Supreme Court
[2018] UKSC 8
Matching text sample:
...agreed or stipulated time for return has not yet arrived.
...procedures to ensure their prompt return to the State of their...
“(a) to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed to...
...child has been taken, seeking return of the child. States... ...article 12 to order the return of the child “forthwith”... ...in article 20 which permits refusal to return where such would amount to... ...human rights, that obligation to return is subject to very limited... ...(but do not require) return not to be ordered.... ...behind parent; grave risk that return would expose the child to... ...), and in article 12 (child has been in the recipient... ...unless it is determined that return is not to be ordered... ...period is exceeded. Thus the return is summary and its object...
-
A & B (Separate Representation), Re
High Court (Family Division)
[2024] EWHC 2834 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 2834 (Fam) Case No: FD23P00148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 8 November 2024 Before : SIR ANDREW MCFARLANE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION RE: A & B (Separate Representation) Mr Richard Harrison KC and Mr James Mulholland (instructed by Creighton and Partners) for the Applicant Father Mr Mark Jarman KC and Ms Indu Kumar (instructed by Wilson Solicitors LLP) for the First Respondent Mother Mr Jamie Niven-Phillips, Solicitor of Cafcass Legal for the Second and Third Respondents (by their Children’s Guardian, Ms Allison Baker) Mr Christopher Hames KC (instructed by Ms Nina Hansen of Freemans Solicitors on behalf of the Children directly) Hearing date: 1 November 2024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
C (Children)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2017] EWCA Civ 980
Matching text sample:
...When their mother did not return with the children to Australia... ...an order for their summary return. HHJ Bellamy, sitting as... ...2016. It is against that refusal that the father appeals.
Re P and O (Child Abduction: Anticipatory Breach)
...“was effectively forced not to return to Australia in order to...
...I will not base my return to Australia at your demand...
-
P (Habitual Residence, Art 13(b) Grave Risk of Harm), Re
High Court (Family Division)
[2024] EWHC 1863 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 1863 (Fam) Case No: FD24P00172 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 19 July 2024 Before : Miss Nageena Khalique KC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Social Services of Naples Applicant - and - A Father
-
AT v SS
High Court (Family Division)
[2015] EWHC 2703 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
...father, AT for the summary return of S to Holland pursuant...
...progress. The mother opposes the return of S to the Netherlands... ...to decide to order his return.
...that to order the summary return of S to Holland would... ...discretion to refuse such a return. Whilst the dispute in...
...of the mother’s continued refusal to co-operate with the...
-
HB v A Local Authority & Anor (Wardship - Costs Funding Order)
High Court (Family Division)
[2017] EWHC 524 (Fam)
Matching text sample:
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 524 (Fam) Case No: FD16P000415 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 21/03/2017 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MACDONALD HB -and- A Local Authority -and- The Local Government Association Applicant Respondent
-
A v R
High Court (Family Division)
[2020] EWFC 87
Matching text sample:
NEUTRAL CITATION No [2020] EWFC 87 Case No: ZW19P01451 IN THE WEST LONDON FAMILY COURT BETWEEN: A Applicant - and - R Respondent JUDGMENT dated 20 JULY 2020: HHJ CORBETT sitting as a section 9(1) Deputy Judge of the High Court FINAL HEARING 24 JUNE 2020 Introduction D’s father (F) issued an application under the Children Act 1989 in order to seek court orders regulating how and when he might see the parties’ son D. This is my Judgment following the listed final hearing on 24 June 2020. I apologise for the delay in sending this judgment to the parties, I can only attribute this to the volume of work during the current CV19 pandemic. In this Judgment I will concentrate on those parts of the evidence and submissions which have assisted me to make decisions about D, it is by no means a full account of all that I have read in the bundle nor heard in submissions. I can assure the parties that I have taken account of all of the written and oral material made available to me. I will...