Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,537 documents found

Results listing

  • Epoch Company Ltd v Character Options Ltd High Court (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) [2017] EWHC 556 (IPEC) Matching text sample:

    UK Patent No. 2498410B (“the Patent”) is for a toy...

    ...The beads claimed in the Patent are polyhedral and necessarily transparent... ...use the term employed in Patent – which makes them more...

    ...(“Epoch”) owns the Patent and alleged that the defendant... ...Options counterclaimed, alleging that the Patent is invalid on two overall...

    ...conditional application to amend the Patent. Unusually, this was not...

  • Excel-Eucan Ltd v Source Vagabond Systems Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2019] EWHC 3175 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ”) holds UK Patent Number GB2489116 for an ammunition...

    Excel entered into a patent licence agreement with the Defendant...

    ...filed and was granted another patent for a further development of...

    ...not enforceable absent a valid patent

  • Nokia Corp v Interdigital Technology Corp High Court (Patents Court) [2007] EWHC 3077 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...a parent and a divisional patent whose specifications are very similar...

    ...challenge the validity of any patent which claimed an invention I... ...as the subject matter of patent actions becomes increasingly complex such...

    ...be infringed by, and the patent to be essential to,...

    A patent specification is to be construed...

  • Aerotel Ltd v Wavecrest Group Enterprises Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2009] EWCA Civ 408 Matching text sample:

    ...He held Aerotel’s UK patent No. 2,171,877... invalid. If the patent had been valid it would...

    The patent is about a method of... ...prior art and that the patent was for subject-matter excluded... ...Access); (2) Japanese Patent Application №. 56020371 A...

    The patent comes from a different and...

    The patent is pitched at a very...

  • Aylo Premium Ltd & Anor v Aylo Premium Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2024] EWHC 1310 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...of its preference under the Patent Courts Practice Statement without the...

    ...by DISH on the '680 patent in proceedings in this Court... ...in Munich on the '805 patent and in the UPC also... on the '680 patent. There are various minor...

    ...different patents, the '680 patent versus the '805 patent, but in the meantime,... ...claim to revoke the '805 patent by proceedings begun on 12th...

    ...rather fell under the general patent court regime, the Practice... ...that the party attacking the patent wanted a decision before German...

  • Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Technology UK Limited & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2024] EWCA Civ 1143 Matching text sample:

    ...applications for SEPs). A patent is said to be standard... ...necessarily involve infringement of the patent in the absence of a...

    ...courts competent to adjudicate upon patent disputes.

    ...it. (The unitary EU patent now confers a monopoly within... ...Thus an inventor wishing to patent their invention must apply for... a patent in every state in which... ...they do not obtain a patent, the invention may be...

    ...claim for infringement of a patent granted by another state is... ...claim for infringement of a patent granted by state B at... ...if the validity of that patent is in issue. This... ...commonplace for a claim for patent infringement to be met with... ...and/or counterclaim that the patent is invalid, the practical... ...of the state where the patent was granted have exclusive jurisdiction... ...over the enforcement of that patent. It follows that SEPs...

  • OOO Abbott & Anor v Design & Display Ltd & Anor High Court (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) [2014] EWHC 2924 (IPEC) Matching text sample:

    ...found that the Claimants’ European Patent (UK) No. 1... 816 931 (“the Patent”) was valid and had...

    ...the invention claimed in the Patent in the following way:

    ...were found to infringed [the Patent] that was sold by...

    ...grounds for supposing, that the Patent existed for the purposes of...

  • Research In Motion UK Ltd. v Inpro Licensing SARL High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 70 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...It is not unusual in patent actions for one or (... ...the commercial importance of the patent. This patent, which is said to...

    ...particular area with which a patent is concerned can read himself...

    The title of the patent is “A Proxy-Server...

    ...Wide Web, with which the patent is primarily concerned, depends...

  • L'Oreal (UK) Ltd & Anor v Liqwd Inc & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2019] EWCA Civ 1943 Matching text sample:

    ...decisions of Birss J in patent infringement proceedings brought by the... ...-10 of Olaplex’s UK Patent No. 2 525 793... (“the Patent”) were invalid; but...

    ...the protection conferred by the Patent. There is no dispute... ...the priority claimed in the Patent, and that as a... ...11 was obvious over Korean Patent Application No PAT 2003-0003970...

    ...demonstrates that Olaplex’s International Patent Application No. WO 2015/... ...entitled to priority from US Patent Application No 61/093,239... ...deprives claim 11 of the Patent of novelty.

    ...27]-[29] that the Patent is directed to a

  • Nokia Corporation v Interdigital Technology Corporation High Court (Patents Court) [2004] EWHC 2920 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...InterDigital"). InterDigital is a patent holding and licensing company for...

    ...require licences under InterDigital's patent portfolio for GSM. InterDigital...

    ...a licence under InterDigital's patent portfolio. This dispute, that...

    ...bring proceedings to revoke a patent. But it is said...