Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,537 documents found

Results listing

  • Monkey Tower Limited v Ability International Limited High Court (Patents Court) [2014] EWHC 18 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...”) for revocation of UK Patent GB 2432573 (“the Patent”) in the name of...

    ...that claim 1 of the Patent, both as granted and... ...not requested, or if the Patent was not amended to the...

    ...to propose amendments to the Patent. MTL accepts that section...

    ...alternative circumstances in which a patent may be amended are to...

  • Group Lotus Plc & Anor v 1Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2011] EWHC 1366 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...ideas, technical information, letters patent, trade marks, service marks...

    ...Parties may apply for a Patent in its own name in... ...Main Parties applies for a Patent then it shall notify the...

    ...other Main Party wishes corresponding Patent protection to be obtained in...

    ...party proposes to file a Patent Application based on the communicated... ...propose to apply for any Patent, the non-communicating party... ...right to apply for a Patent and all rights associated therewith... ...-communicating party to obtain a Patent. Upon the granting of... any Patent resulting from any such application...

  • HTC Corporation v Gemalto SA Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2014] EWCA Civ 1335 Matching text sample:

    ...10 July 2013 in a patent action. Before the judge... ...932 865 ("the 865 patent" or "865") and...

    ...say no more about that patent.

    The 865 patent

    ...is reference to a French patent application which is said not...

  • Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd v Conversant Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2019] EWCA Civ 38 Matching text sample:

    ...for infringement of a UK patent, including an injunction and...

    ...in which Conversant has no patent protection. It would be...

    ...validity is determined in the Patent Reexamination Board (“PRB”)...

    patent.

  • Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Incorporation & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2016] EWHC 2220 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...the Patents CDMA Technically Necessary Patent?

    ...the Law. He has taught patent law and contract law since...

    Patent Licensing Transactions

    ...from 1997 drafting and prosecuting patent applications. He became a... Chartered Patent Attorney in 1999 and a... European Patent Attorney in 2000. Since...

  • Koninklijke Philips NV v Asustek Computer Inorporation & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2020] EWHC 29 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...the licensing of the Philips patent portfolio (the “Philips Portfolio... ...Philips Portfolio comprises nearly 80 patent families, covering a range...

    A Standard Essential Patent is a patent which protects a technology which...

    ...owner of a Standard Essential Patent may use the monopoly conferred... by the patent to hold-up users after... ...by refusing to license the patent at all or by extracting...

    ...protected by a Standard Essential Patent which is incorporated into a...

  • Prudential Plc & Anor, R (on the application of) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax & Anor High Court (Administrative Court) [2009] EWHC 2494 (Admin) Matching text sample:

    ...of Appeal in respect of Patent Agents in

    ...by Parliament in respect of Patent Agents and Trade Mark Agents...

    ...authority mentioned earlier relating to Patent Agents that is binding on... ...Appeal in the case of Patent Agents.

    ...had received advice from their patent agents. The Plaintiff’s... ...the relevant Defendants and their patent agents in relation to the... ...of the history of the patent agents’ profession showing how... ...years and evidence that the patent agents’ profession was the... ...by section 104 of the Patent Act 1977 was not wide... ...common law privilege to cover patent agents.

  • Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others United Kingdom Supreme Court [2014] UKSC 55 Matching text sample:

    ...associated companies. In Europe, patent protection for the compound itself... .... However, the corresponding Canadian patent for the compound will not... ...relates to a United Kingdom patent not for the compound but...

    ...for infringement of the UK patent. On 7 August, Mann... ...1538. He held that the patent had been infringed but that...

    ...for infringement of the Canadian patent for the compound itself.... ...J held that the Canadian patent was valid and infringed,...

    ...infringement of Servier’s Canadian patent. The second, which I...

  • Price & Ors v Flitcraft Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2019] EWHC 2476 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...summary judgment in relation to patent and copyright infringement by the...

    ...not rely on the ‘989 patent; he only relied on... the ‘714 patent. Secondly, he drew my...

    ...of infringement of the 714 patent. Mr. Austen made it... ...number of claims of that patent, he was restricting his... ...claim 1 of the 714 patent. He was also restricting...

    ...was also taken to the patent itself. My attention was...

  • Actavis UK Ltd v Janssen Pharmaceutica NV High Court (Patents Court) [2008] EWHC 1422 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...Limited seeks revocation of European Patent No 0 334 429 (... “the Patent”) which is in the... .... (“Janssen”). The Patent concerns the stereochemistry of an... ...amend certain claims of the Patent. Actavis maintains that the Patent, even if so amended...

    The Patent

    The Patent has an unchallenged priority date...

    The Patent begins by saying that United... States Patent No 4,654,362 (... the “362 patent” cited as prior art... ...identifies the discovery underlying the Patent in the following terms: