Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,537 documents found

Results listing

  • Actavis UK Ltd. v Merck & Co. Inc Rev 1 High Court (Patents Court) [2007] EWHC 1311 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ”) European Patent (UK) 0724 444 (... the Patent”). The Patent concerns the use of a... ...is 5mg daily. The basic patent for finasteride was EP 004...

    The Patent relates to the use of... ...and female pattern baldness. The Patent discloses the result that low... ...on Claim 1 of the Patent which I will come to...

    ...also the applicants for European Patent (UK) 285 382 which...

    The Patent specification describes a “method...

  • Cloud Cycle Limited v Verifi LLC & Anor High Court (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) [2024] EWHC 2001 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...1 720 689 (“the Patent”, or “EP 689”... ...will explain more about the Patent in due course but essentially... ...and exclusive licensee of the Patent and it is unnecessary to...

    ...for purposes of implementing the Patent.

    ...was not disputed that the Patent was addressed to a team...

    The Patent relates to concrete delivered to...

  • Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg High Court (Patents Court) [2011] EWHC 2719 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...counterclaim. I held that the patent in suit, European Patent (UK) No 1 841... 268 (“the patent” or “268”) had... ...which provides that, where a patent is found to be partially... ...whether the specification of the patent was framed in “good...

    ...trial, the validity of the patent was attacked on a number...

    ...Frohwitter was Robert Bosch’s patent attorney. In 2007 Bosch’... s patent portfolio was assigned to IPCom...

    ...or persons who drafted the patent. IPCom’s response, delivered...

  • Pfizer Inc & Anor v Modernatx Inc High Court (Patents Court) [2024] EWHC 1648 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...Appeals to hear appeals in patent matters. She has now...

    ...multiple-volume treatise on US patent law:

    ...have a general understanding of patent law and litigation. Such... ...does not infringe a particular patent. There can be doubt... ...about the scope of a patent’s claims. There can... ...about the validity of a patent. Accordingly, Pfizer/BioNTech could...

    ...law, a defendant to a patent infringement claim should not be...

  • TQ Delta, LLC v Zyxel Communications UK Ltd & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2019] EWCA Civ 1277 Matching text sample:

    The owner of a patent which is essential to a... ...be implemented without infringing the patent, (“a standard essential patent” or “SEP”) is...

    ...a trial on the technical patent issues, so that an...

    ...The patents in suit, European Patent (UK) No 1,453... ,268 (“the 268 patent”) and European Patent (UK) No 1,792... ,430 (“the 430 patent”) were asserted to be... ...ITU-T”). The Common Patent Policy of ITU-T and... ...policy include a requirement for patent holders to provide and file...

    ...ZyXEL had infringed the 268 patent but that the 430 patent was invalid. Both patents... ...it was valid, the 268 patent had only three months to...

  • Scinopharm Taiwan Ltd v Eli Lilly & Company High Court (Patents Court) [2009] EWHC 631 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...0,577,303 (“the Patent”) which is owned by... ...Company (“Lilly”). The Patent has an earliest priority date...

    ...was protected by a basic patent (EP 0,122,707)...

    The Patent is a process patent which describes an improved way...

    ...- process described in the Patent.

  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The patent

    This is a patent case concerning EP (UK)... ...entitled “Immunopotentiating Compositions”. The patent claims a first priority date... July 2003 and the patent was granted on 22

    ...Merck’s product infringes the patent and Merck contends that Ono... ’s patent is invalid. Ono also... ...stance does not mean the patent is to be judged by...

    ...claimed priority date for the patent. Ono accepts that if...

  • Cunningham v Nokia Corporation High Court (Chancery Division) [2008] EWHC 1174 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...is the proprietor of GB Patent 2400958B (“the Patent”). This relates to... ...claim to priority and the patent was granted on 7 December...

    The patent application consists of three pages... ...without professional assistance from a patent attorney.

    ...allows the proprietor of a patent or any other person to... ...constitute an infringement of the patent or as to whether or... to what extent the patent is valid. This procedure... ...cost service to help resolve patent disputes. It allows the... ...the need for full blown patent proceedings. But consistent with...

    ...opinion as to whether the Patent was infringed by a Nokia... ...PT-6 did infringe, the Patent was valid. The attack... ...before the date of the Patent, so that if either... ...fell within the claims the Patent would be invalid for anticipation... ...prior art which included a patent application (WO 03/075242A1)...

  • Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd & Anor v ResMed Ltd & Anor High Court (Chancery Division) [2017] EWHC 2748 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    THE 258 PATENT

    The remaining patent, which I have to... ...707 258 (“the 258 patent”). It has a...

    The 258 patent is said to lack novelty...

    ...ResMed asserts, that the 258 patent is infringed by FPH’s... ...that it infringed the 258 patent having been dropped earlier on...

  • InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2023] EWCA Civ 34 Matching text sample:

    This appeal relates to patent EP (UK) 2 485... ...priority from January 2006. The patent belongs to the respondents (... ...the 4G/LTE standard. The patent forms part of a portfolio... ...validity and essentiality of this patent was addressed in the judgment...

    Lenovo argued that the patent was invalid on grounds of... ...invalidity and argued that the patent was essential to the standard... ...The judge decided that the patent was essential and rejected all...

    ...now) relevant claim of the patent is claim 1. Broken...

    ..., but that is optional (patent paragraph [0037]). As...