Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2007] EWCA Civ 364 Matching text sample:

    ...and utterly unravelled if the patent is later held invalid in... the European Patent Office (“EPO”)?...

    Unilin’s Patent involved was granted on 26 ...EPO. It is a European Patent (UK) (“EP (...

    ...date of publication of the patent application (2 ...Art. 67 of the European Patent Convention (“EPC”).

    ...order for revocation of the Patent.

  • Novartis AG & Anor v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd (t/a Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2009] EWHC 1671 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    This is a patent infringement action concerning extended wear... ...and exclusive licensees of European Patent UK No 0,819,258... (“the Patent”) and they contend that... ...the defendants have infringed the Patent by selling certain contact lenses... ...counterclaim for revocation of the Patent contending that it lacks novelty...

    The Patent is somewhat unusual in that... ...to the validity of the Patent and whether it is infringed...

    The Patent claims first, second and... ...1995. The application for the Patent itself was filed on 22...

    ...first substantive attack on the Patent. The defendants say that... the Patent lacks novelty under section 2... ...predecessor in title to the Patent. These applications contain a... ...which also appear in the Patent. Hopken claims priority from... ...first priority document as the Patent and Domschke claims priority from... ...defendants say that, unlike the Patent, the Hopken and Domschke... ..., that if, as the Patent suggests, some or all... ...the Patent,...

  • Coflexip S.A. & Anor v Stolt Offshore Ms Ltd. & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2004] EWCA Civ 213 Matching text sample:

    ...the registered proprietor of European Patent (UK) No 0478742 (... “the Patent”). The Patent contains product and process claims...

    ...the exclusive licensee of the Patent, Technip Offshore Limited (together... ...”) for infringement of the Patent. Coflexip’s Particulars of...

    ...in the Specification” of the Patent and by, inter alia,... ...invention described in the … Patent”;

    Stolt denied infringement of the Patent, and counterclaimed that it...

  • Baillie & Ors v Bromhead & Co (A Firm) & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2014] EWHC 2149 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    Patent practice worldwide and its relevance

    ...the purchase of the Hirotec patent

    (2) The Hirotec patent

    ...for professional negligence concerning a patent attorney. In 1999, the... ...during the day. Their first patent applications were filed in June...

  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd v Medimmune Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 181 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...are joint proprietors of European Patent (UK) No. 2... 055 777 (“the Patent”). The Patentees are... ...granted in respect of the Patent. The Claimant (“Novartis”... ...MRC’s interest in the Patent and the SPC. MedImmune...

    ...held that (i) the Patent was invalid and (ii)... ...Appeal will conclude that the Patent is valid and has been...

    ...enables the proprietor of a patent for a medicinal product to... ...extends the duration of the patent with respect to that product... ...for the effective loss of patent term caused by the need...

    ...of an application for a patent for a new medicinal product... ...of effective protection under the patent insufficient to cover the investment...

  • Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited v Zodiac Seats UK Limited (formerly known as Contour Aerospace Limited) United Kingdom Supreme Court [2013] UKSC 46 Matching text sample:

    ...the infringement of a European Patent which does not exist in... ...“TBA”) of the European Patent Office (“EPO”) has...

    ...the form in which the patent was originally granted the relevant... ...English courts had held the patent to be valid and specifically...

    ...principal provisions of the European Patent Convention. provides that a European Patent (UK), i.e.... ...as if it were a patent granted under ...“the proprietor of a European Patent (UK) shall accordingly as... ...as the proprietor of a patent under ...or amendment of a European Patent by the EPO (“EPO...

    Effect of European Patent (UK

  • Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS High Court (Chancery Division) [2009] EWHC 58 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    This is a patent action whose subject matter is...

    ...this case - the central patent itself adopts a metaphor rather...

    ...not the subject of the patent. They are distinguished for...

    ...has a relevance to the patent and the prior art,...

  • Idenix Pharmaceutical, Inc v Gilead Sciences, Inc & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2014] EWHC 3916 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The parties and their respective patent applications

    Federal patent law

    The Patent

    Federal law - patent assignment requirements

  • Medeva's SPC Applications, Re (Rev 1) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2010] EWCA Civ 700 Matching text sample:

    ...to the holder of a patent or his successor in title... ...the rights conferred by his patent but subject to the same... ...which the application for the patent was lodged and the first... ...as defined, protected by the patent less five years. The... ...of protection conferred by the patent so as to enable the...

    ...filed an application for a patent for a method of making... ...) is not required. The patent was granted on 18th February...

    ...not protected by Medeva’s patent. In the case of... ...those protected by Medeva’s patent the market authorisation covered a...

    patent and the active ingredients in...

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Anor (Rev 2) High Court (Patents Court) [2017] EWHC 2988 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    Unwired Planet have a worldwide patent portfolio which includes numerous patents...

    ...2015 to July 2016. The patent in trial A was patent EP (UK) 2 229... ...to self-configuring networks, the patent in trial C was EP... ...to inter-RAT handover, the patent in trial D was EP... ...to Hadamard codes, and the patent in trial E was EP... ...to network messaging. The 712 patent was not said to be...

    ...SEPs in suit) and per-patent licences for any SEPs the... ...the royalties claimed for per-patent licences or a UK portfolio...

    ...proposal was for a per-patent licence limited to the UK...