Search results
Results listing
-
TUI UK Ltd v Griffiths
United Kingdom Supreme Court
[2023] UKSC 48
Matching text sample:
...led the evidence of an expert who opined that, on... ...defendant did not require the expert to attend for cross-examination... ...judge, that deficiencies in the expert’s report meant that the...
...case when the claimant’s expert had given uncontroverted evidence as...
...given permission to rely on expert evidence from a gastroenterologist and...
...not intend to rely on expert evidence from a microbiologist.... ...without the support of any expert evidence. TUI lodged witness... ...was accepted on paper. His expert evidence was therefore uncontroverted in...
-
Darby Properties Ltd & Anor v Lloyds Bank Plc
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2016] EWHC 2494 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...question of the admissibility of expert evidence and experts’ reports...
...opinion is that evidence of expert opinion is admissible if relevant...
The terms on which expert evidence is admissible is governed...
...Procedure Rules 1998 deals with expert evidence. Rule 35.1...
-
ZVI Construction Co LLC v The University of Notre Dame (USA) In England
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
[2016] EWHC 1924 (TCC)
Matching text sample:
...enforcing the decision of an expert and to obtain declarations as...
...person shall act as an expert and his decision shall be...
...to submissions made to the expert on 30
...UND intended to use the expert determination procedure set out in...
-
Ambra Borgognoni Vimercati v BV Trustco Ltd & Ors
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2012] EWHC 1410 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...concerns the interpretation of an expert determination clause (“the Expert Determination Provision”). The... ...determination of issues concerning the Expert Determination Provision in connection with...
...the 2011 Appointment, including the Expert Determination Provision reads as follows...
...or such part by an expert to be appointed by the...
...the shares pursuant to the Expert Determination Provision, required that... ...the terms upon which the expert is instructed, and insisted... ...with the terms of the Expert Determination Provision in the 2011... ...they propose to instruct the expert valuer is as follows:
-
Dermot Joseph Doyle v HDI Global Speciality SE
High Court (King's Bench Division)
[2023] EWHC 2722 (KB)
Matching text sample:
...problem as regards the same expert not observing orders of the... ...to the management of the expert evidence and the impact on...
...an initial report from an expert Mr Muir, but he... ...substitute for Mr Muir. This expert will be referred to in... ...the home and produced an expert’s report on 1 December... ...to substitute ABC as his expert witness and to rely on...
In relation to expert evidence, a joint statement... ...engage with Mr Mancini, the expert for HDI.
...Clarke ordered that unless the expert reports were agreed, the...
-
Phoenix Life Assurance Limited & Ors, Re
High Court (Insolvency and Companies List)
[2023] EWHC 2612 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...John Jenkins (the “Independent Expert”), a Fellow of... ...at Milliman LLP. The Independent Expert’s appointment was approved by...
...evaluations performed by the Independent Expert, the PRA and the... ...of the Parties. The Independent Expert has considerable expertise and has...
The Independent Expert has a status that is... to that of an expert witness in adversarial litigation whose... ...parties can call evidence (including expert evidence) and test each... ...different role for the Independent Expert from that performed by an... expert witness in adversarial litigation.... ...the report of the Independent Expert is intended to be “...
...the reports of the Independent Expert and the Regulators, not...
-
Baker Tilly (a firm) v Makar
High Court (Queen's Bench Division)
[2009] EWHC 1715 (QB)
Matching text sample:
...to be permitted to adduce expert evidence from an accountant in...
...Employment Tribunal gave permission for expert evidence from an accountant in...
...the identity of a joint expert and the terms of reference... for a joint expert by Tuesday 29 August 2006...
own expert by 1 September 2006.
-
JP Morgan International Finance Limited v WEREALIZE.COM Limited
High Court (Commercial Court)
[2024] EWHC 1437 (Comm)
Matching text sample:
Submissions and expert evidence (on the US...
...to be determined following an expert valuation process.
...whole (as determined by the expert fair market valuation process)...
...appointment of a Third Valuation Expert in view of the fact...
-
Empyreal Energy Ltd v Daylighting Power Ltd
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
[2020] EWHC 1971 (TCC)
Matching text sample:
...Robert Sliwinski, acting as an expert, had jurisdiction to determine...
...purported to refer to the expert determiner, and which he... ...permitted to be referred to expert determination in accordance with Clause...
...to refer the dispute for expert determination in accordance with the...
...the court to provisions for expert determination
-
Apache North Sea Limited v Neo Energy Central North Sea Limited & Ors
High Court (Commercial Court)
[2023] EWHC 1345 (Comm)
Matching text sample:
...considering the role of the Expert when carrying out expert determinations in accordance with the... ...terms of the DSA, because expert determination is the parties’... ...to confine the scope of expert determinations in a manner that...
...to be resolved, which involves expert determination if agreement cannot be... ...not agree for resolution by expert determination. For the Relevant... ...to refer the dispute for expert determination. There is a... ...dispute as to how the Expert should be appointed and more... ...have said already, how the Expert should approach the expert determination he is mandated to...
...the court rather than the Expert and it wished to have... ...purpose of ensuring that the Expert resolves the issues left to... ...the court ahead of the Expert embarking on the expert determination, whilst reserving the... ...are for determination by the Expert applying the standard of a...
...or are properly for the Expert rather than the court to...