Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc (Rev 1) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2013] EWCA Civ 451 Matching text sample:

    ‘022 Patent)

    ‘022 Patent)

    ‘948 Patent)

    ‘948 Patent)

  • Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The Patent

    ...“Microsoft”) have infringed European Patent (UK) No. 0... ...system and method” (“the Patent”). Microsoft deny infringement... and claim that the Patent should be revoked on the...

    Technip France SA’s Patent

    ...uncontroversial technical background to the Patent.

  • Technetix BV & Anor v Teleste Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2019] EWHC 3106 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...259 074 B8 (‘the Patent’). The invention claimed...

    The Patent teaches the use of a...

    ...an indirect infringement of the Patent pursuant to s.60(2...

    ...counterclaims for revocation of the Patent, alleging lack of novelty... ...in the application for the Patent as filed.

  • Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group Plc & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 1393 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...to this problem. It obtained Patent No. 0481929 (“929”...

    The 929 Patent was the subject of challenge... ...were fields in which the patent specifications of the leading players... ...that this Original Rotoseal infringed Patent 929, because the glue...

    ...did not infringe the 929 Patent.

    ...Defendants had infringed the 929 Patent because:-

  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2015] EWHC 3973 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...conclusion was that the '878 patent is valid and would be...

    .... One is the '878 patent, which I have dealt... ...with, but the other was patent EP (UK) 2 161... 336. This patent had a slightly later priority... ...three years after the '878 patent. There was a question... ...Merck's product infringed that patent. In the end what... ...was an amendment to that patent. As a result of... ...in relation to the '336 patent to an end. They...

    ...s claims that the '336 Patent be revoked and for a... ...non-infringement of the '336 Patent, on the standard basis...

    ...Having decided that the '878 patent is valid, in broad... ...relevant date when the '336 patent fell away should be paid... ...in relation to the '336 patent on 17th February 2015....

  • Lufthansa Technik AG v Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2024] EWHC 1918 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The patent in suit EP(UK)...

    Patent

    ...devices. Claim 1 of the Patent is to an ISPS system...

    ...Morgan J held that the Patent was valid and that all...

  • Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Sandoz GmbH & Anor (Rev 1) High Court (Patents Court) [2016] EWHC 3317 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...restrain Sandoz from infringing European Patent (UK) No. 0... 934 061 (“the Patent”) by dealings in a...

    ...934 061 B3 (the ‘Patent”) is in force,... ...1011) in territories where the Patent and corresponding patents are not...

    ...below, until expiry of the Patent).

    The Patent

  • A P Racing Ltd v Alcon Components Ltd Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2018] EWCA Civ 1420 Matching text sample:

    ...by Alcon Components Ltd infringe patent GB 2,451,690.... ...between these parties over the patent in suit has reached this... ...to the validity of the patent. The decision of this...

    ...the general background to the patent, which I need not... ...prior art calipers, which the patent describes as follows:

    The patent overcomes this defect by the... ...loads caused when braking. The patent explains:

    ...important for racing cars. The patent goes on to explain that...

  • Novartis Ag v IVAX Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 2506 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...of allogenic organ transplants. UK Patent 2,222,770 (“770... ” or “the Microemulsion Patent”) claims priority from September... 1988. The second patent, UK Patent 2,380,674, claims... ...” or “the Second Component Patent”.

    ...and the claims of this patent, I should consider the... ...addressee of the specification. The patent is plainly directed to a...

    ...that the disclosure of the patent in suit is to be...

    ...that the invention of the patent in suit enables the preparation...

  • Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Medinol Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2010] EWHC 2865 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...stemming from the common European Patent Application, and later Patent, No. 0 762 856... ...turn was based on International Patent Application No. WO/9603092...

    ...divisional from a fourth European Patent Application, No. 0 846... ...Opposition Division of the European Patent Office. The decisions to...

    ...the Patents in the European Patent Office. By the time...

    ...lack of novelty over European Patent Application No 0 540 290... ...(“Lau”) and International Patent Application No. WO 95/...