Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • Ratiopharm GMBH v NAPP Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...to revoke two patents, European Patent (UK) Nos. 722730... ...case is now a conventional patent action brought by Napp against...

    ...the priority date of the patent there were a number of...

    The 730 patent explains at [0001] that... ...patient. At [0003] the patent claims that

    ...opioid analgesics”, the 730 patent includes at [0014] a...

  • Cipla Ltd. & Ors v Glaxo Group Ltd. High Court (Patents Court) [2004] EWHC 477 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...four actions to revoke UK patent 2 235 627 which stands...

    In general terms, the patent in suit relates to an...

    The patent in suit

    The patent is entitled ‘Inhalation medicaments...

  • Optis Cellular Technology LLC & Ors. v Apple Retail UK Limited & Ors. Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2022] EWCA Civ 792 Matching text sample:

    ...concerns the validity of European Patent (UK) No. 2... ...Wireless Communication Network”. The patent was filed on 7 October... ...on appeal is whether the patent is anticipated by a prior...

    . The same patent was previously litigated in

    ...was common ground that the patent was essential/infringed. The patent issues were all concerned with... ...Apple’s case that the patent lacked novelty or was obvious...

    ...is the problem which the patent relates to. All of...

  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2021] EWHC 1048 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The Patent

    ...December 2020 involving a different patent but that trial was settled... ...as I understand it, the patent in question will play no...

    ...925,142 (EP142 or the Patent), of which the Second...

    ...context. As is usual in patent cases, this judgment needs...

  • European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc. High Court (Patents Court) [2007] EWHC 600 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...claim for revocation of European Patent (UK) 0 455 750... (“the Patent”) which is directed to... ...claim for infringement of the Patent against the claimant (the...

    ...claims for revocation of the Patent in various European jurisdictions....

    The application for the Patent was filed on 16 January... ...dated 18 January 1989. The Patent had a long prosecution and...

    The Patent is now alleged to be...

  • Wright Hassall LLP v Horton Jr & Anor High Court (Queen's Bench Division) [2015] EWHC 3716 (QB) Matching text sample:

    ...the grant of a UK patent and in June 2005 for... an international patent in respect of the invention... ...the invention. However, no patent could ultimately be granted on...

    ...made an application for a patent in the United States.... ...an application for a European patent.

    ...its own application for a patent in the United States.

    ...a joint owner of a patent (or an application for... a patent) "shall not without the... ...assign… a share in the patent [or application]…".

  • Mayne Pharma Ltd & Anor v Debiopharm SA & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 1123 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...infringement in relation to this patent and it was formally withdrawn...

    ...no longer protected by a patent.

    .... After all, obviously the patent is in principle of interest... ...actual field with which the patent is concerned do not form...

    ...describes the problem which the patent sets out to overcome....

  • Select Healthcare (UK) Ltd v Cromptons Healthcare Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2011] EWHC 1830 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    This patent action concerns patient slide sheets...

    ...the exclusive licensee of UK Patent No. GB 2 433... ...is the proprietor of the Patent. The application was filed... ...13 December 2005 and the Patent was granted on 20 August...

    ...“Cromptons”) has infringed the Patent by importing and selling a... ...an exclusive licensee under the Patent and also denies that Poly... ...counterclaimed for revocation for the Patent on the grounds of obviousness...

    US Patent No 4,051,565 entitled...

  • Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2010] EWCA Civ 718 Matching text sample:

    ...concerns the validity of European Patent (UK) 1 255 510... (“the Patent”), which was filed... ...on 31 January 2001. The Patent is called “stent” valves... ...is the proprietor of the Patent. The respondent, Edwards Lifesciences... ...Mr Justice Kitchin revoked the Patent. This is the appeal...

    The Judge held that the Patent was invalid for obviousness in... the light of US Patent 5,411,552 published on... ...priority date enjoyed by the Patent, if valid, because that... ...- on construction of the Patent, on obviousness and infringement,... ...the priority date of the Patent - and also in respect... ...15 and 22 of the Patent. Edwards has filed a...

    ...that the claims of the Patent were obvious over Andersen,...

    ...at the time of the Patent. Neither side criticises what...

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2017] EWHC 1304 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...licence at trial). Since patent EP (UK) 2 229...

    ...the terms of a final patent injunction and the terms of...

    ...relief should be in a patent case with a FRAND licence...

    ...restrain infringement of the relevant patent(s) but ought to...