Search results
Results listing
-
Parainen Pearl Shipping Ltd & Ors v Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Skipsrederi AS & Ors
High Court (Patents Court)
[2017] EWHC 2570 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...negative declarations relating to European Patent No. 2 032 426... ...from a ship” (“the Patent”) owned by the First... ...the UK designation of the Patent pursuant to Article 5(3... ...11 other designations of the Patent, however. The Defendants contend...
The Patent claims priority from Norwegian Patent Application NO 20062650 filed on... 9 June 2006. The Patent was designated in 32 countries... ...challenge the validity of the Patent in these proceedings.
...a process that infringe the Patent. The Claimants contend that,... ...exhausted their rights under the Patent in relation to the Vessel...
declarations of non-infringement of patent EP 2,032,426 in...
-
AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Limited & Anor.
High Court (Patents Court)
[2023] EWHC 164 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...between them) have infringed European Patent (UK) 3 295 663... B1 (“the Patent”).
The Patent concerns billboards of the sort...
...conditional application to amend the Patent which is resisted by Supponor...
Obviousness over Patent Application WO 2013/186278 A1...
-
Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2008] EWCA Civ 153
Matching text sample:
...arrangements for deciding European wide patent disputes. Too often one...
...national right (most importantly a patent), is only the national...
...the jurisdiction of the European Patent Office under the Convention on... ...or validity of any European patent granted for that State
...the common situations. Liability for patent infringement (we will confine... ...and the validity of the patent: you can’t infringe... an invalid patent. The nature of a... ...outside the scope of the patent”. If that is all... ...about the scope of the patent and what the defendant does... ...within the scope of the patent. But the patent is invalid.” Then the... ...within the scope of the patent and also contending that the... patent is invalid. A particular... ...what I do, then the patent is invalid.” (This...
-
Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Ors
High Court (Patents Court)
[2015] EWHC 1029 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...Unwired Planet brought proceedings for patent infringement in this jurisdiction.... ...1 105 991. The 514 patent is a divisional of 287...
...0 989,712. This 712 patent was not acquired from Ericsson...
...to the conventional allegations of patent infringement, the Particulars of...
...licence under any Unwired Planet patent which has been found to...
-
The Secretary of State for Health & Anor v Servier Laboratories Ltd & Ors
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...0 308 341 (“341 Patent”).
...action relates to a further patent which was granted to the... ...1 296 947 (“947 Patent”) which had, among... ...The application for the 947 Patent was filed at the EPO... ...6 July 2001 and the patent was granted on 4 February... 2004. The patent was opposed by ten opponents... ...EPO decided to maintain the patent, for reasons which it... ...UK designation of the 947 Patent.
...alleged infringement of the 947 Patent: [2006] EWHC 2137...
...J held that the 947 Patent was invalid since it lacked... ...was obvious over the 341 Patent: [2007] EWHC 1538... ...UK designation of the European patent.
-
Wagner International AG & Ors v Earlex Ltd
High Court (Patents Court)
[2011] EWHC 3897 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...a preliminary issue in a patent action. The claim form...
...is for infringement of European Patent UK No. 0596939 entitled... ...paint spray gun". The patent was filed in 1992,... ...It expires in 2012. The patent relates to an air gun...
...pleaded a defence that the patent is invalid on various grounds...
...grounds for supposing that the patent existed".
-
Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group Plc & Ors
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2012] EWHC 911 (Ch)
Matching text sample:
...to this problem. It obtained Patent No. 0481929 (“929”...
The 929 Patent was the subject of challenge... ...were fields in which the patent specifications of the leading players... ...that this Original Rotoseal infringed Patent 929, because the glue...
...did not infringe the 929 Patent.
...Defendants had infringed the 929 Patent because:-
-
Danisco A/S v Novozymes A/S
High Court (Patents Court)
[2011] EWHC 3288 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...of Appeal of the European Patent Office. Te second is...
...for revocation of Novozymes' European Patent (UK) 1 804 592... (“the Patent”). The Patent relates to pelleted animal feed... ...a steam treatment process. The Patent was filed on 27 September...
...in that product infringe the Patent and other intellectual property rights... ...a product based on the patent on the EU market at...
...between the parties concerning the Patent and related rights in Denmark...
-
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Anor v Teva UK Ltd & Ors
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2017] EWCA Civ 1671
Matching text sample:
...validity and infringement of a patent concerning tadalafil. Tadalafil is...
The patent, EP (UK) 1,... 173,181 (the “181 patent” or “the patent”), is owned by... ...2003. The form of the patent in issue is a B3...
...proceedings to revoke the 181 patent and so clear the way... ...were threatening to infringe the patent.
...the revocation of the 181 patent on various grounds. They... ...in the application for the patent as filed; secondly, that... the patent lacked novelty over three publications... ...”); thirdly, that the patent was obvious in the light... ...that the specification of the patent did not disclose the invention...
-
IDA Ltd & Ors v The University of Southampton & Ors
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2006] EWCA Civ 145
Matching text sample:
...about who should own a patent. In the Patent Office each side said it...
...University to apply for a patent. A Mr Ashby was...
...University to take out a patent which would preclude IDA from...
...thought to be necessary, in patent entitlement proceedings, to prove... ...claims entitlement of another’s patent application or part of it...