Skip to Main Content
Beta

Help us to improve this service by completing our feedback survey (opens in new tab).

Search results

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

173 documents found

Results listing

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2017] EWCA Civ 266 Matching text sample:

    ...standards proposal referred to as “Motorola TDoc”.

    ...of the disclosure of the Motorola TDoc. I will first...

    The disclosure of the Motorola TDoc

    The Motorola TDoc is a short document...

  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd & Anor v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2016] EWCA Civ 489 Matching text sample:

    ...No COMP/M.6381-Google/Motorola Mobility

    ...Inc (“Google”) of Motorola Mobility Holdings Ltd (“Motorola Mobility”), including Motorola Mobility’s patent portfolio which... ...regarding its intended acquisition of Motorola Mobility’s SEPs stating that... it would honour Motorola Mobility’s pre-existing commitment... ...maximum royalty rate at which Motorola Mobility had been prepared to...

    ...Google would be bound by Motorola Mobility’s FRAND commitment with... ...the FRAND commitments given by Motorola Mobility. This is in...

    ...Google on the basis of Motorola Mobility’s SEPs would allow...

  • Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2005] EWCA Civ 1007 Matching text sample:

    ...conversation about EPO with the Motorola team

    ...results. The team doctor of Motorola, the first professional cycling...

    During your years with the Motorola team (1992-96) sources... ...discussions never took place, that Motorola was ‘as pure as...

    ...was during his time at Motorola will lead to fresh questions...

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...The WAP forum included Ericsson, Motorola and Nokia. Between 1999...

    Microsoft v Motorola

    Motorola – Enforcement of GPRS

    Microsoft v Motorola

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd & Anor (Rev 2) High Court (Patents Court) [2017] EWHC 2988 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...The WAP forum included Ericsson, Motorola and Nokia. Between 1999...

    Microsoft v Motorola

    Motorola – Enforcement of GPRS

    Microsoft v Motorola

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another United Kingdom Supreme Court [2020] UKSC 37 Matching text sample:

    Apple Inc v Motorola Inc

    ...dispute between Microsoft Inc and Motorola Inc show the willingness of... ...basis for distinguishing these cases. Motorola offered Microsoft a worldwide licence... ...disputed the offers, arguing that Motorola had breached its obligation to... ...alleging breach of contract and Motorola counterclaimed that it had offered... ...its lawsuit in the USA, Motorola commenced proceedings in Germany to...

    Microsoft Corpn v Motorola Inc

    ...conditions of any licence which Motorola was obliged to provide,...

  • Simtel Communications Ltd v Rebak & Ors High Court (Queen's Bench Division) [2006] EWHC 572 (QB) Matching text sample:

    ...the receivership for 50,000 Motorola mobile handsets for shipment to...

    ...first of these is the “Motorola Deal”.

    (8) The Motorola Deal

    ...through for the purchase of Motorola phones for onward sale to...

  • Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos De Venezuela SA High Court (Commercial Court) [2008] EWHC 532 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    Motorola (No 2)

    Motorola Credit Corporation v Uzan and...

    Motorola (No 2)

    Motorola (No 2).

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2018] EWCA Civ 2344 Matching text sample:

    Motorola

    ...for the Commission was whether Motorola had infringed Article 102 TFEU... ...of Germany under all of Motorola’s SEPs for a number... ...German courts, if necessary. Motorola argued that this offer was... ...covered Germany. The Commission rejected Motorola’s arguments. It found... ...s offer was FRAND, that Motorola’s pursuit of an injunction... ...SEPs in Germany, and that Motorola’s position was adequately protected... ...absence of an objective justification, Motorola had abused its dominant position...

    ...example, [437]) that Motorola had not advanced any credible...

    Microsoft Corporation v Motorola Inc

  • FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Limited v VietJet Aviation Joint Stock Company High Court (Commercial Court) [2024] EWHC 1823 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    Motorola Solutions v Hytera Communications

    ...as was made clear in Motorola at [74] (above)...

    Motorola Solutions Inc v Hytera Communications...

    ...to the substantive threshold, in Motorola the Court of Appeal (...