Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

249 documents found

Subscribe to these results

Results listing

  • N (A Child) (Welfare Hearing), Re Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 323 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 323 (B)

    [2024] EWFC 2
  • E and H (Care Orders), Re Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 49 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 49 (B)

    Neutral citation: [2024] EWFC (B)
  • Coventry City Council v XX & Ors Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 249 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 249 (B)

    ...Enfield v E (Unconscionable Delay)[2024] EWFC 183,

  • London Borough of Enfield v E (Unconscionable Delay) Family Court [2024] EWFC 183 Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 183

    [2024] EWFC 183
  • A v R Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 218 (B) Matching text sample:

    IN THE FAMILY COURT SITTING AT NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Case No. 1679-9268-9032-8515 Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWFC 218 (B) IN THE MATTER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973 BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE DODSWORTH IN PRIVATE BETWEEN : A Applicant - and - R Respondent JUDGMENT Jonathan Walker-Kane (instructed by Major Family Law) for the Applicant Timothy Spain (instructed by Sintons LLP) for the Respondent This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.00am on 5 August 2024 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives. Introduction
  • TI v LI Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 163 (B) Matching text sample:

    This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media and legal bloggers, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so may be a contempt of court. IN THE FAMILY COURT SITTING AT THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE Neutral Citation No. [2024] EWFC 163 (B) Case No . 1682-6112-5851-2182 (Suit) (FR) 21 st June 2024 BEFORE RECORDER NICHOLAS ALLEN KC BETWEEN TI Applicant and LI Respondent Mr. Max Lewis (instructed by Hanne & Co LLP) for the applicant Mr. Tim Bishop KC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the respondent
  • Z (Prohibition on Cross-examination: No QLR), Re Family Court [2024] EWFC 22 Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 22
  • XP v YP Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 319 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 319 (B)
  • FZD v MQB (summary return from Scotland) Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 205 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 205 (B)
  • G (Non-Accidental Head Injuries), Re Family Court [2024] EWFC 172 Matching text sample:

    [2024] EWFC 172

    ...34 and the father is 41. The parents met in September...
Complete our short survey