Search results
Results listing
-
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Sandoz GmbH & Ors
High Court (Patents Court)
[2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...-Lambert’s licensing of the Patent
...“Sandoz”) from infringing European Patent (UK) No. 0... 934 061 (“the Patent”) by dealings in a...
...out of proceedings concerning the Patent between Warner-Lambert and Pfizer...
...claims for revocation of the Patent, of Warner-Lambert’s... ...1 and 3 of the Patent and of Actavis’ claim...
-
Astrazeneca AB v Hexal AG & Ors
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2013] EWCA Civ 454
Matching text sample:
...the validity of a European Patent (UK) No. 0,... 907, 364 (the Patent). It is for sustained...
...the 6 claimant companies the Patent is invalid. They say... ...what is claimed in the Patent to be an inventive step...
...way. They point to the Patent as itself recognising the general... ...form of a pharmaceutical. The Patent specifically draws attention to the...
patent and the Patent in this case. Mr... ...claim for revocation of the patent in suit failed, whereas...
-
Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd v The Comptroller-General of Patents
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2011] EWCA Civ 228
Matching text sample:
...(SPC) based on their patent EP (UK) No.... ...518 468 (“Neurim’s patent”). In his judgment...
...a medicine for insomnia. Their patent is for such formulations....
...They had applied for their patent on 23
...the Neurim MA the Neurim patent had less than 5 years...
-
Pozzoli Spa v BDMO SA & Anor
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2007] EWCA Civ 588
Matching text sample:
that its patent, EP (UK) 0... ...permission is granted and the patent held valid, Pozzoli appeals... ...within the scope of the patent.
Since the patent was held invalid, it...
...to revoke or forfeit a patent shall be available”.
...the first time holds a patent invalid. Does Art.32... ...reached the decision that the patent is invalid to remit the... ...court which actually revoked the patent so that there could be...
-
Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech Inc
High Court (Patents Court)
[2015] EWHC 1796 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
The Patent
...Board of Appeal concerning the Patent
...(“Genentech’s”) European Patent (UK) No. 1... 037 926 (“the Patent”). The Patent relates to the use of...
...claimed priority date of the Patent of 12 December 1997....
-
KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors
High Court (Patents Court)
[2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...N deny infringement of either Patent and counterclaim for revocation of...
...the subject of an International Patent Application by WFU, No.... ...family of patents, including European Patent No. 0 620 720...
This is the second patent action brought by KCI against...
...extended the scope of the patent.
-
Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly & Company Ltd
High Court (Patents Court)
[2008] EWHC 2345 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...to seek revocation of European Patent (UK) No 0 454... 436 (“the Patent”) which belongs to the...
The Patent has a priority date of...
...the claims made in the patent as to the advantages of...
.../or obviousness attacks on the Patent.
-
HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc
High Court (Patents Court)
[2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat)
Matching text sample:
...those patents and the 948 patent. HTC Corporation counterclaimed for... revocation of the 948 patent. I will refer to...
...the court in construing the patent are summarised by the Court...
...solution to the problem the patent addresses, the number and...
Richardson-Vicks' Patent
-
Burnden Group Plc v Ultraframe (UK) Ltd & Anor
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2005] EWCA Civ 867
Matching text sample:
whether claim 7 of UK Patent 2,259,926 (“Scholes...
...was right to hold the patent invalid. Accordingly we so...
...the relevant portions of the patent in suit and inclusion of... ...below dealing with the Scholes patent because it is not,...
...of the description of the patent in his paragraphs 12-24...
-
Microsoft Corporation v Motorola Mobility LLC
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
[2013] EWCA Civ 1613
Matching text sample:
...25 January 2013 revoking European Patent (UK) No. 0... 847 654 (“the Patent”) and dismissing the claim... ...”) for infringement of the Patent.
The Patent relates to the synchronisation of...
...that the claims of the Patent were invalid either for lack... ...contrary to his conclusion, the Patent was valid, it was...
...in his interpretation of the Patent, in his interpretation of... ...to claim 1 in the Patent (“Claim 1”),...