Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd High Court (Chancery Division) [2005] EWHC 686 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    The invention described in the patent is intended to be useful...

    The patent in suit (GB 2335687...

    Claim 1 in the patent was not novel; but...

    ...which was disclosed in the patent, as filed (“added...

  • Cantel Medical (UK) Ltd v ARC Medical Design Ltd High Court (Patents Court) [2018] EWHC 345 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    European Patent (UK) No. 2... 575 590 (“the Patent”);

    UK Patent No. 2 478 081... (“the UK Patent”);

    The Patent and the UK Patent are for the same invention... . The Patent is still the subject of... ...opposition proceedings before the European Patent Office. The Patent was upheld in amended form...

    ...the arguments relating to the Patent and those relating to the... UK Patent. They had the same... ...will refer largely to the Patent because its paragraphs are numbered...

  • Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...product infringes Convatec’s European Patent (UK) No. 1,... ...Stabilized Antimicrobial Materials”. The patent is concerned with the silverisation...

    ...have had to consider this patent at a trial between these... ...have had to consider a patent dispute between Convatec and Smith...

    ...remaining was about the 013 patent. I held that Durafiber... ...a valid claim of that patent (

    ...to revoke Convatec’s silverisation patent No. EP (UK)... ...held that Convatec’s 510 patent was valid ( ...risked infringement of) the 510 patent. So after my judgment... ...non-infringement of the 510 patent. Convatec counterclaimed alleging infringement...

  • DLP Ltd, Re UK Intellectual Property Office Decision High Court (Patents Court) [2007] EWHC 2669 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    IN THE MATTER OF UK Patent No. 2 394 175...

    ...Scrabo”), infringed its UK patent number 2,394,175B (... “the patent”). On 20 October... ...tray did not infringe the patent. DLP requested a review...

    The proprietor of a patent or any other person may...

    ...constitute, an infringement of the patent;

  • Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech Sia Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2021] EWCA Civ 1924 Matching text sample:

    ...also held that a fifth patent was invalid, but there... ...order for revocation of that patent.

    European Patent (UK) No. 1... 530 578, European Patent (UK) No. 3... 002 289 and European Patent (UK) No. 3...

    ...Labelled Conjugates” (“the 415 Patent”). The application for... this patent was filed on 16 May...

    he 415 Patent

  • Facebook Ireland Ltd v Voxer IP LLC High Court (Patents Court) [2021] EWHC 1377 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    This case is about European Patent (UK) No. 2... ...the claimant Facebook infringes the patent. Facebook denies infringement and... contends the patent is invalid. The proceedings...

    The application for the patent was filed on 29 ...date in this case. The patent was granted on 17

    ...it is common ground the patent must be revoked. It...

    Voxer contends that the patent is infringed by the live...

  • Ipcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2017] EWCA Civ 90 Matching text sample:

    ...April 2015 finding that European Patent (UK) 1 841 268... (“the patent” or “the patent in suit”) was valid... ...to be accepted, then the patent would be invalid for disclosing...

    The patent was granted on 17 March... ...2010. The application for the patent was divided out of the... application for European Patent 1 186 189 (“the... parent patent”). Proceedings in relation... to the parent patent between Nokia and IPCom came... ...and resulted in the parent patent being revoked (see ...then, however the (divisional) patent in suit had been granted... . The patent in suit came before me... ...2011. I held that the patent was valid in an amended... ). The patent was, however, also the... ...“OD”) held that the patent as granted was invalid on... ...upheld the validity of the patent with the claim in the...

    ...the principal claim of the patent to bring it into line... ...the EPO is concerned, the patent remained in its form as...

    ...prior decisions concerning the patent in this jurisdiction....

  • Cintec International Ltd v John Humphries Parkes (t/a Dell Explosives) & Anor High Court (Chancery Division) [2003] EWHC 2328 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...June, Mr. Parkes’ then patent agents JY & GW Johnson... ...copy of Cintec’s own patent application covering its Waterwall products...

    ...replied to by Cintec’s patent agents, Wynne-Jones Lainé... ...each party would consult its patent agents about whether there had...

    ...you arrange for your former patent attorneys or current advisers (... ...the owners of patents and patent applications cited against your patent applications during their pendency.

    ...a detailed analysis of what patent rights you own, which...

  • Tulane Education Fund v The Comptroller General of Patents High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 932 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...11 August 2000. The basic patent upon which the SPC application...

    ...day on which the basic patent expires. It follows that...

    ...an exclusive licence under the Patent (and SPC) to Æterna... ...), to pay its various patent and SPC fees, including... ...of fees in relation to patent and other intellectual property rights...

    ...the fee using the electronic patent, design and trade marks... ...payments for various third party patent renewals.

  • HTC Corporation v Nokia Corporation High Court (Patents Court) [2013] EWHC 3778 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...(“Nokia’s”) European Patent (UK) No. 0... 998 024 (“the Patent”). On 28 November... ...to restrain infringement of the Patent, to grant HTC permission...

    ...from continuing to infringe the Patent. HTC did not dispute...

    ...right in question is a patent, and the patent has a considerable period to... ...In the case of consensual patent licences, these questions are...

    ...to restrain infringement of a patent can never be withheld and...