Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • IGT / Acres Gaming Inc, Re High Court (Patents Court) [2008] EWHC 568 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    And in the matter of Patent Application No GB 0311200 in...

    Patent application GB 0311200

    The patent application explains that issuing one...

    As described in the patent application, what happens at...

  • Edwards Lifesciences Corporation & Anor v Meril GMBH & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2020] EWHC 2938 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...at the end of every patent case to have a debate...

    ...to say the costs of patent litigation. Also, to be... fair, patent cases in particular can raise... ...for example, more than one patent was tried together and the... ...a good example because one patent is about 19½ years... ...aspects of this technology. One patent relates to the valve,... ...different. For the '753 patent it is fair to say... ...won; and on the other patent, that is to say... the '929 patent, although Meril won in...

    ...issue-based costs orders in patent actions which may involve deductions...

    ...one party won on one patent and the other party won... on the other patent. In fact, in ...for one side on one patent and for the other side...

  • Nokia Technologies OY v Telecommunications Corp, Ltd & Ors. - [2022] EWHC 2814 (Pat) High Court (Patents Court) [2022] EWHC 2814 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    Ideas patent

    ...“Oppo”) have infringed European Patent (UK) No. 3... ...716 560 B1 (“the Patent”) by the sale of... ...infringement and say that the Patent is invalid.

    ...a licence for Nokia’s patent portfolio. In a parallel... ...(“SEPs”), but the Patent is not alleged to be... ...sometimes called an “implementation” patent.

    ...mobile phones without infringing the Patent. That is not surprising... given that the Patent is an implementation patent and not a SEP.

  • Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd v Apple Retail UK Ltd & Anor (on 726 and 675 patents) High Court (Patents Court) [2013] EWHC 467 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The 726 patent

    The disclosure of the 726 patent

    The 675 patent

    The disclosure of the 675 patent

  • Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Scott (t/a Scotts Potato Machinery) High Court (Patents Court) [2009] EWHC 2691 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...Machinery) for infringement of European Patent (UK) No 730 399... ...admits) and contends that the Patent is invalid and that design... ...counterclaims for revocation of the patent, unjustified threats of patent infringement and for declarations about...

    The Patent, and indeed the action...

    ...that the invention of the patent in suit came to be...

    The patent in suit

  • Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2014] EWCA Civ 1629 Matching text sample:

    ...“dry fryers”. The European Patent EP 2 085 003 B1... (the “Patent”) in issue is entitled... ...is the proprietor of the Patent. Groupe SEB UK Limited,... ...the exclusive licensee under the Patent. The two SEB entities...

    ...3 and 8 of the Patent were invalid, that claims... ...judge’s construction of the Patent and the finding of infringement...

    ...Stripped of all complexity, the Patent concerns an apparatus for frying... ...in the terminology of the Patent) the food so as... ...this case, according to the Patent, are:-

    ...of identifying numerals in the Patent to construe its meaning.... ...fryer does not infringe the Patent, properly construed, because the... ...whereas the specification of the Patent shows (and the Actifry... ...in “Vogt”, a German Patent No. P 21 02...

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2015] EWHC 3366 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The patent

    This is a patent case in the mobile telecommunications... ...priority date claimed by the patent is 8th January 2008,... ...US 61/019,746. The patent itself was granted on 22nd... ...claimant Unwired Planet acquired the patent from Ericsson.

    The patent is concerned with an efficient...

    ...of cases which concern the patent portfolio acquired by Unwired Planet...

  • Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC High Court (Patents Court) [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    Application to patent court

    The Patent

    ...claims for revocation of the Patent, of Warner-Lambert’s... ...1 and 3 of the Patent and of Actavis’ claim...

    ...of the claims of the Patent was obvious over any of...

  • Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Co (Rev 1) High Court (Patents Court) [2016] EWHC 234 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...salts were protected by European Patent No. 0 432 677,... ...The protection conferred by that patent was extended by Supplementary Protection... ...2015. Lilly also owns European Patent No. 1 313 508... (“the Patent”) for the use of... ...folic protein binding agent. The Patent will not expire until 15...

    ...United Kingdom designations of the Patent with a view to clearing... ...and Spanish designations of the Patent (see my judgment dated...

    ...or indirect infringement of the Patent. In a judgment delivered... ...that the claims of the Patent were restricted to pemetrexed disodium...

    ...constitute indirect infringement of the Patent if marketed with instructions to...

  • Jushi Group Co Ltd v OCV Intellectual Capital LLC Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2018] EWCA Civ 1416 Matching text sample:

    ...Jushi”), to revoke European Patent 1 831 118 (“the... patent”) belonging to the respondent... ...). The judge held the patent was valid and (on... ...ought to have found the patent invalid for lack of novelty...

    The patent claims a priority date in...

    At [0007] the patent refers to the conditions under...

    At [0012] the patent acknowledges as prior art U... .S. Patent 4 199 364 (“Neely...