Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

126 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • Surendra Dayal v Pravind Kumar Jugnauth and 5 others (Mauritius) Privy Council [2023] UKPC 37 Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKPC 37

    ...Mr Jugnauth resumed his position as Prime Minister. That is...

    Mr Jugnauth attended as “chief guest” and made... ...Pension (“BRP”) from Rs 6,210 to Rs 13,500 during LAM’s... ...-age pension would increase from Rs 6,210 to Rs 6,710 as of January 2020.

    ...with the minimum salary ie Rs 9,000. And you... ...rupees and we had promised as soon as we come in power we... will increase it to Rs 5,000. We kept... ...promise, we brought it to Rs 5,000 and the government...
  • Greenwich Contracts Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2023] UKFTT 874 (TC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKFTT 00874 (TC)

    ...order to observe the proceedings. As such, the hearing was...

    ...‘Greenwich’, also referred to as ‘GCL’) appeals under

    ...transactions by their initials only, as I do not consider it...
  • Align Technology Switzerland GmbH & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2024] UKFTT 1100 (TC) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation: [2024] UKFTT 001100 (TC) Case Number: TC09374 TAX CHAMBER Taylor House, London Appeal reference: TC/2024/01608 TC/2024/02229 TC/2024/02344 TC/2024/05369 PROCEDURE – Value Added Tax – appeal to First-tier Tribunal against decision and assessments - assessments withdrawn – application to strike out appeals – jurisdiction of Tribunal where assessments withdrawn – whether appeals should be struck out or allowed by Tribunal – whether underlying decision withdrawn – whether appeals against underlying decision should continue - whether further appeal not notified to HMRC should be expedited to be heard with other appeals Heard on: 26 November 2024 Judgment date : 5 December 2024 Before TRIBUNAL JUDGE GREG SINFIELD Between Align Technology Switzerland GmbH Align Technology BV Appellants
  • Learna Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) [2023] UKFTT 972 (TC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKFTT 00972 (TC)

    LS & RS v HMRC [2017] UKUT...

    ...2023, HMRC emailed the Tribunal as follows:

    ...(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (as per

  • LS, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Merton High Court (Administrative Court) [2024] EWHC 584 (Admin) Matching text sample:

    Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 584 (Admin) Case No: AC-2023-LON-003615 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 14/03/2024 Before : MR JUSTICE FREEDMAN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: THE KING (ON THE APPLICATION OF LS) Claimant - and –
  • Salman Iqbal v GEO TV Limited High Court (King's Bench Division) [2023] EWHC 3024 (KB) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 3024 (KB)

    (sitting as a Judge of the High...

    ...of no confidence. His successor as prime minister was Shehbaz Sharif...

    ...Hamza Shahbaz, who was elected as the Chief Minister of Punjab...
  • AD v Disclosure and Barring Service Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) [2023] UKUT 280 (AAC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] UKUT 280 (AAC)

    ...his A-levels, obtained employment as a teaching assistant (an

    ...2015) – without incident – as a

    ...him in a reference letter as ‘
  • SR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) [2024] UKUT 308 (AAC) Matching text sample:

    IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No. UA-2024-000529-PIP ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER [2024] UKUT 308 (AAC) On appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) Between: S.R. Appellant – v – Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (SSWP) Respondent Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Wikeley Decision date: 26 September 2024 Decided on consideration of the papers Representation: Appellant: Mr Larry Dance Respondent:
  • SA (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage), Re Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2023] EWCA Civ 1003 Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWCA Civ 1003

    ...a marriage is not recognised as valid in England and Wales...

    ...the marriage “is not recognised as valid in this jurisdiction”....

    ...the judge’s declaration contending, as set out in refined grounds...
  • Re T & Anor Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2023] EWFC 143 (B) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWFC 143 (B)

    ...This is an unusual application, as the local authority are content...

    ...not notice the swelling to Rs head at that time,...

    ...a bleed on his brain, as well as significant facial injuries. A...
Complete our short survey