Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,540 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • Citation Plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd High Court (Queen's Bench Division) [2012] EWHC 549 (QB) Matching text sample:

    “That the patent is valid, and that... ...simply preventive…. Where a patent is infringed the patentee has... ...the Defendants have infringed the patent, but we must look...

  • MÖLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE AB v BRIGHTWAKE LIMITED High Court (Patents Court) [2011] EWHC 140 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    The rules applicable to patent actions, which are in...

    ...follows. Claim 6 of the patent provides certain characteristics which must...

    ...purely a hypothesis, that the patent was valid but was not...

  • Corporation of London v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2004] EWCA Civ 1765 Matching text sample:

    ...a statutory footing and letters patent of Charles II granting market...

    ...rights formerly granted by letters patent, to regulate in detail...

    The effect of the letters patent of Charles II of 1670...

    ...was provided that the letters patent should cease to have effect...

  • Baxter Healthcare Corp & Anor v Abbott Laboratories & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 919 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...the other claims of the patent in suit) does not...

    ...-infringement is sought infringe the patent. They do not advance...

    ...2 to 4 of the patent.”

  • Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Limited High Court (Chancery Division) [2012] EWHC 2637 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    Sieckmann v Deutches Patent und Markenamt

    ...Bundespatentgericht (“BPG” or Federal Patent Court) considered an application...

    ...the upshot of the Federal Patent Court’s decision to be...

    Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys v Registrar of Trade...

  • KW & Ors v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (Rev 3) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2015] EWCA Civ 1054 Matching text sample:

    ...had held that a certain patent was invalid. Following the... ...for the restoration of the patent to the register without deciding... ...the grounds that, for a patent to be restored to the...

  • Texas Instruments Incorporated v Network System Technologies LLC High Court (Patents Court) [2024] EWHC 1066 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ..., that is the '683 patent, and the two other...

    ...the validity of the ‘683 patent prior to the UPC final...

    ...be progressed if the '683 patent is split out and tried...

  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd, R (on the application of) v Licensing Authority & Ors High Court (Administrative Court) [2005] EWHC 710 (Admin) Matching text sample:

    ...date of expiry of a patent protecting the original medicinal product...

    ...from the filing of a patent application to the grant of...

    ...line is protection afforded by patent law supported by the additional... ...in January 2003. The European patent was revoked on 19 August...

  • Crowson Fabrics Ltd v Rider & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2007] EWHC 2942 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...the public, such as the patent specification in the Patent Office, or the KLENT...

    ...was available such as the patent specification or the KLENT grip...

    ...below) that publication of the patent and the use of the... information in the patent would not be actionable....

  • Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 Matching text sample:

    ...in relation to a European patent to prevent the defendants from... ...to infringe the claimants’ European patent. In due course, at... trial, the European patent was found to be invalid... ...of infringement of a Canadian patent in respect of the manufacture...