Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,540 documents found

Results listing

  • Cuthbert v Gair & Anor (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) High Court (Senior Court Costs Office) [2008] EWHC 90114 (Costs) Matching text sample:

    Re Nossens Letter Patent

    re Nossens Patent

    re Nossens Patent

  • Lenovo Group Limited & Ors v Ericsson Limited & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...for infringement of a UK patent with the implementer pleading,...

    ...seeking and/or enforcing any patent injunctions or exclusion orders against...

    ...of other aspects of its patent portfolio (see paragraph ‎82...

    ...’s equipment sued Lenovo for patent infringement.

  • Stichting BDO & Ors v BDO Unibank, Inc & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2013] EWHC 418 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys v Registrar of Trade...

    ...applies in the case of patent claims: see Articles 84,... ...and 138 of the European Patent Convention and

    ...and precise, just as when patent claims are amended.

  • Youlton v Charles Russell (a firm) High Court (Chancery Division) [2010] EWHC 1032 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...company’s exposure to a patent claim in the United States...

    Patent Claim

    ...the full year”. The Patent Claim had settled. Continued...

    The Patent Claim had been noted in...

  • Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2017] EWCA Civ 147 Matching text sample:

    ...as to damages in a patent action which this Court had... ordered having found the patent in suit to be valid... ...the retrospective amendment of the patent by the European Patent Office on the ground that...

  • Thomas v Luv One Luv All Promotions Ltd & Anor High Court (Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) [2020] EWHC 1565 (IPEC) Matching text sample:

    ...unsuccessful opposition in the European Patent Office gave rise to a...

    ...Opposition Division of the European Patent Office, the cause of... ...of action, was whether the patent should be maintained or revoked... ...to 102 [of the European Patent Convention]."

  • Hasbro Inc & Ors v 123 Nahrmittel GmbH & Anor High Court (Chancery Division) [2011] EWHC 199 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...revoke the marks in national patent offices, and sought his...

    ...short he was running what patent lawyers would call a “...

    ...the present case. In a patent case such arguments rely on... ...within the claim of a patent as an infringement it will... ...is no equivalent of the patent claim in the field of...

  • Hone & Ors v Abbey Forwarding Ltd & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2014] EWCA Civ 711 Matching text sample:

    ...injunction in support of a patent which the trial judge held... ...It is the sort of patent which can give the patent system a bad name…”...

    ...means of a second generation patent that is a “try...

    ...the assessment of damages for patent infringement, in

  • Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd v Dechert LLP High Court (Chancery Division) [2014] EWHC 3389 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...of the costs of English patent proceedings argued that it should...

    ...validity of the defendant’s patent. Shortly before trial, the... ...it intended to surrender the patent and at the subsequent hearing... ...for an order that the patent be revoked. The judge...

  • Law Debenture Trust Corporation (Channel Islands) Ltd. v Lexington Insurance Company & Ors High Court (Commercial Court) [2003] EWHC 2297 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...’s offer to surrender the patent, and the judge had... ...Connaught offered to surrender the patent. SmithKline did not accept...

    ...the application to revoke the patent was not conceded but not...