Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

568 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • Ebury Partners Belgium NV/SA v Grossiste Francochine SARL High Court (Commercial Court) [2023] EWHC 3396 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...refer to the decision of Foxton J in

    ...from paragraph [10] of Foxton J’s judgment.

    Foxton J there referred to two...

    ...approach is, as indicated by Foxton J in the

  • Eurafric Power Limited v The Bureau of Public Enterprises of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & Ors High Court (Commercial Court) [2022] EWHC 3548 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...land) was recently considered by Foxton J in

    ...this regard at [13], Foxton J summarises the guidance as...

    ...note that at [13] Foxton J highlights, in particular,...

    ...[14] of his judgment, Foxton J addressed the situation where...

  • OT Computers Ltd v Infineon Technologies Ag & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2021] EWCA Civ 501 Matching text sample:

    Mr Justice Foxton

    Foxton J held that, in...

    After citing these cases, Foxton J identified two aspects of...

    Foxton dated 28 February 2020 and... ...Costs Order of Mr Justice Foxton dated 22 April 2020

  • Cardiff City Football Club Limited v William Arthur McKay & Ors High Courts (Business and Property Courts) [2024] EWHC 2953 (KB) Matching text sample:

    ...and summary of principles by Foxton J in

    ...-31. In that case, Foxton J was being asked to... ...way” (para 17). Foxton J cited Mann J in...

    Foxton J said in

    ...of relevant factors suggested by Foxton J in the

  • Campbell v Campbell High Court (Chancery Division) [2016] EWHC 2237 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...application came before Mr David Foxton QC, sitting as a...

    ...on the basis that David Foxton QC’s decision dated 20...

    ) were analysed by Mr Foxton QC in his judgment dated... ...Claimant on his instructions. Mr Foxton QC’s decision can be...

  • Njord Partners SMA-Seal LP & Ors v Astir Maritime Ltd & Ors High Court (Commercial Court) [2024] EWHC 1682 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    On 15 April 2020 Foxton J granted a worldwide freezing...

    On 3 July 2020 Foxton J gave summary judgment in...

    ...[112]-[117] per Foxton J (affmd

    ...at [117(i)] (Foxton J) and at [61...

  • Fimbank Plc v KCH Shipping Co Ltd United Kingdom Supreme Court [2024] UKSC 38 Matching text sample:

    ...by the decision of David Foxton QC sitting as a deputy...

    Mr Foxton first considered whether by reference...

    Mr Foxton then considered and rejected an...

    ...current, 25th ed (2024: Foxton, Bennett, Berry, Smith,...

  • Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd v Uttam Galva Steels Ltd High Court (Commercial Court) [2018] EWHC 2977 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    David Foxton QC

    ...contracts is summarised in Mr. Foxton’s skeleton argument at paragraph...

    ...2 to which note Mr. Foxton referred in his reply).... ...White Book to which Mr. Foxton referred). The clauses in...

  • LAMIA CORPORATION SRL & OTHERS v TOKIO MARINE KILN SYNDICATES LIMITED & OTHERS High Court (Commercial Court) [2022] EWHC 3323 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    ...Individuals, which was heard by Foxton J on 19 April 2021... . As Foxton J recorded in his judgment...

    Foxton J’s reasons for granting...

    ...notice by Henshaw J and Foxton J respectively. By Consent...

    ...within it. Nevertheless, as Foxton J explained in ...anti-suit injunction. Indeed, Foxton J stated at [16]...

  • The Financial Conduct Authority v London Property Investments & Ors High Court (Chancery Division) [2022] EWHC 1041 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...distinction was recently considered by Foxton J in

    ...understand the context in which Foxton J permitted the defendant to...

    ...paragraphs 9 and 13 of Foxton J’s judgment that in... ...for a limited purpose. As Foxton J explained in paragraph 12...