Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

126 documents found

Atom feed

Results listing

  • Decision Inc Holdings Proprietary Limited & Anor Stephen Garbett & Anor High Court (Chancery Division) [2023] EWHC 588 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 588 (Ch)

    Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge

    ...that copies of this version as handed down may be treated... as authentic.

    Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge
  • Star Axe I LLC v Royal and Sun Alliance Luxembourg SA - Belgian Branch & Ors High Court (King's Bench Division) [2023] EWHC 2784 (Comm) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 2784 (Comm)

    The facts as to the transaction giving rise...

    ...will refer to these bills as ‘the Bills of Lading’...

    As the vessel was proceeding to...
  • NM v PM Family Court (B - district and circuit judges) [2024] EWFC 199 (B) Matching text sample:

    In the Financial Remedies Court sitting at Medway (Remotely) Thursday 18 July 2024 Case Number 1703-0002-1318-3153 Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWFC 199 (B) Before DDJ Nahal-Macdonald In the matter of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 Between NM (applicant/husband) -v- PM (respondent/wife) Preliminary Issue Hearing Background The case before me today is an ongoing matter within the Financial Remedies Court (‘FRC’) between the applicant husband and respondent wife. For brevity, I will refer to them either as the applicant or respondent or as H and W, as is customary, no offence is intended. The hearing was for a determination of a preliminary issue. H was represented by Mr GILCHRIST and W by Mr HARLEY, both of counsel. H is a Solicitor-Advocate aged 69 who has practiced primarily in the fields of criminal and regulatory law, and W is a Barrister aged 58 who is the head of the family team at chambers in London. The parties married in 2010 and separated in 2023, on W’s account, or...
  • Michael Brown & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2024] EWCA Civ 92 Matching text sample:

    ...of a house in Surrey as the last step in a...

    [2023] 4 WLR 11

    ...In summary the scheme works as follows:

    ...A. At the same time as the completion of the contract...
  • Topalsson GmbH v Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited High Court (Technology and Construction Court) [2023] EWHC 1765 (TCC) Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWHC 1765 (TCC)

    ...object by a process known as rendering. Software development by...

    ...rejected the First Termination Notice as ineffective and affirmed the Agreement...

    ...damages for unlawful termination, quantified as lost profits in the sum... ...carried out and/or invoiced as at the date of termination... as sums to which it is...
  • Tulip Trading Limited (a Seychelles company) v Wladimir Jasper van der Laan & Ors. Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2023] EWCA Civ 83 Matching text sample:

    [2023] EWCA Civ 83

    ...Tulip contends, the developers named as defendants in this case control... ...the developers should be recognised as a new ...including in this case Tulip as true owner of the bitcoin...

    ...court on the same basis as the existing respondents to Tulip...

    ...merits test can be summarised as being whether there is a... ...tried, which is the same as there being a real as opposed to fanciful prospect of... ...success, and is the same as the test for summary judgment...
  • Nigel Midgley v Vossloh Cogifer UK Ltd Employment Appeal Tribunal [2024] EAT 149 Matching text sample:

    EA-2021-001310-RS

    ...will refer to the parties as they were before the employment...

    ...pay the respondent’s costs as set out above. The...

    ...claimant has hitherto been acting as a litigant in person.... ...out in his skeleton argument, as too is, no doubt,...
  • AG v Brent Council Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) [2024] UKUT 166 (AAC) Matching text sample:

    IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Case No . UA-2023-000977-HS ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER [2024] UKUT 166 (AAC) On appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (HESC Chamber) Between: AG Appellant - v – Brent Council Respondent Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Zachary Citron Hearing date: 8 May 2024 Hearing venue: Field House, Breams Building, London EC4 Representation: Appellant:
  • PQ v The Disclosure and Barring Service Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) [2024] UKUT 161 (AAC) Matching text sample:

    IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No. UA-2023-001559-V ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER [2024] UKUT 161 (AAC) On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service Between: P.Q. Appellant - v - The Disclosure and Barring Service Respondent Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Nicholas Wikeley Upper Tribunal Member John Hutchinson Upper Tribunal Member Suzanna Jacoby Hearing date: 30 May 2024 Decision date: 5 June 2024 Representation:
  • Verifone (UK) Ltd v K Zena Employment Appeal Tribunal [2024] EAT 54 Matching text sample:

    EA-2023-000345-RS

    ...was employed by the respondent as a manager, based in... ...pre-determined, so that, as a result, there had...

    ...claim of direct race discrimination as it was not satisfied that...

    ...comparator of a different race; as such, the burden of...
Complete our short survey