Skip to Main Content
Alpha

Help us to improve this service by completing our feedback survey (opens in new tab).

Sabrina Khan v Mohammad Anwar

[2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO)

Case No: SC-2021-APP001193
Neutral Citation Number: [2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
SENIOR COURTS COSTS OFFICE

Thomas More Building

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Thursday, 6 January 2022

BEFORE:

MASTER BROWN

----------------------

BETWEEN:

SABRINA KHAN

Claimant

- and -

MOHAMMAD ANWAR

Defendant

----------------------

SABRINA KHAN appeared in person

MOHAMMAD ANWAR appeared in person

----------------------

JUDGMENT

(Approved)

Digital Transcription by Epiq Europe Ltd,

Unit 1 Blenheim Court, Beaufort Business Park, Bristol, BS32 4NE

Web: www.epiqglobal.com/en-gb/ Email: civil@epiqglobal.co.uk

(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

This Transcript is Crown Copyright.  It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority.  All rights are reserved.

WARNING: reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public, in writing, in a broadcast or by means of the internet, including social media. Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached. A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and/or imprisonment. For guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply, and to what information, ask at the court office or take legal advice.

1.


THE MASTER: I think this application should be struck out. I have heard extensive argument and it seems to be clear there is no jurisdiction for me to hear this matter. If you are to pursue the remedy of an appeal, it seems to me I have given you sufficient indication as to how that might done, although you should not rely upon my advice, you should look it up yourself and take legal advice as appropriate to see what you can do but as far as I can see, the SCCO does not sit on appeal from an FTT judge.

[Judge’s note on approving the transcript: I think there may have been more extensive discussion as to why the SCCO lacked jurisdiction in the argument]

Epiq Europe Ltd hereby certify that the above is an accurate and complete record of the proceedings or part thereof.

Unit 1 Blenheim Court, Beaufort Business Park, Bristol BS32 4NE

Email: civil@epiqglobal.co.uk

This transcript has been approved by the Judge

Sabrina Khan v Mohammad Anwar

[2022] EWHC 2267 (SCCO)

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (82.8 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.