Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Guerrero & Ors v Monterrico Metals Plc & Anor

[2010] EWHC 160 (QB)

Case No: HQ09X02331
Neutral Citation Number: [2010] EWHC 160 (QB)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 12 February 2010

Before :

MRS JUSTICE GLOSTER, DBE

Between :

MARIO ALBERTO TABRA GUERRERO

& OTHERS

Claimants

- and -

(1) MONTERRICO METALS PLC

Defendants

(2) RIO BLANCO COPPER SA

Ms. Catharine Otton-Goulder QC, Richard Hermer Esq, QC & Guy Vassall-Adams Esq

(instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the Claimants

Stephen Phillips Esq, QC and David Simpson Esq

(instructed by Lawrence Graham LLP) for the Defendants

Hearing dates: 8th and 9th July 2009;

Further written submissions: 24th July 2009 and 27th July 2009

JUDGMENT

Ruling: on Claimants’ application for assessment of costs

Mrs Justice Gloster, DBE:

1.

Despite my previous indication that I would summarily assess the Claimants’ costs of and incidental to the hearings before Burton J (2 June 2009), Irwin J (16 June 2009) and myself (8/9 July 2009), in the light of the subsequent correspondence between the parties and the court, I have decided that it would in fact be inappropriate for me to do so. The correspondence shows that various material issues arise as to whether particular items of cost are genuinely to be regarded as costs of and incidental to those hearings, or whether they should be more appropriately treated as general costs of the action.

2.

Accordingly, I consider that it is more appropriate that such matters should be the subject of a detailed assessment by the Costs Judge.

3.

However, I consider that, in place of a summary assessment, it is appropriate, in all the circumstances, to make an interim order against Monterrico for a payment of costs on account, in the sum of £100,000. Such sum is to be paid within 21 days.

Guerrero & Ors v Monterrico Metals Plc & Anor

[2010] EWHC 160 (QB)

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (81.2 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.