Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Ladyga v Prosecutor Generals Office Lithuania

[2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin)

Case No. CO/10065/2011
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Date: Thursday, 19 July 2012

B e f o r e:

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS

----------------------------------

Between:

LADYGA

Appellant

v

PROSECUTOR GENERALS OFFICE LITHUANIA

Respondent

----------------------------------

Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of

WordWave International Limited

A Merrill Communications Company

165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424

(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

----------------------------------

The Appellant appeared in person

Ms H Pye (instructed by Crown Prosecution Service Extradition) appeared on behalf of the Respondent

----------------------------------

Judgment

1.

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: This case, as has been explained to me, has something of a protracted history. All matters outstanding in the appeal were decided by Collins J on 7 February 2012 when he dealt with human rights aspect under Article 8 and Article 3 raised by the appellant.

2.

However, as the arrest warrant in the case had been issued by a prosecutor and as the decision of the Supreme Court in Assange had not yet been handed down, there was an outstanding issue as to whether the prosecutor was an appropriate judicial authority to issue the warrant.

3.

That matter having now been decided by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court having decided that the prosecutor is an appropriate judicial authority, that ground of appeal must also be dismissed, which effectively disposes of the appeal.

4.

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: Thank you, Ms Pye.

5.

MS PYE: Thank you, my Lord.

6.

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: I am so sorry. What do you want to say?

7.

THE APPELLANT: Do I have 17 days before I am extradited?

8.

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: How long does he have?

9.

MS PYE: My Lord, the usual course is there are 14 days in which an application to certify a point of public importance can be made. Once those 14 days expire, then the 10 days in which this gentleman should be removed start to run. So 14 to 24 days.

10.

MR JUSTICE SAUNDERS: Okay. Thank you. I am glad you all have these things at your fingertips, doing these things every day.

Ladyga v Prosecutor Generals Office Lithuania

[2012] EWHC 2807 (Admin)

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (77.8 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.