Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

REGINA v RHYS MORAR

[2022] EWCA Crim 83

WARNING: reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public, in writing, in a broadcast or by means of the internet, including social media. Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached. A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and/or imprisonment. For guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply, and to what information, ask at the court office or take legal advice.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright.  It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority.  All rights are reserved.

[2022] EWCA Crim 83
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL DIVISION

CASE NO 202103962/A3

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

Friday 28 January 2022

Before:

LADY JUSTICE CARR DBE

MR JUSTICE WALL

HER HONOUR JUDGE DHIR QC

(Sitting as a Judge of the CACD)

REGINA

V

RHYS MORAR

__________

Computer Aided Transcript of Epiq Europe Ltd,

Lower Ground, 18-22 Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS

Tel No: 020 7404 1400; Email: rcj@epiqglobal.co.uk (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

_________

NON-COUNSEL APPLICATION

_________

J U D G M E N T

LADY JUSTICE CARR:

1.

Following his earlier guilty pleas, the applicant was sentenced on 16 January 2020 in the Crown Court at Chelmsford to a total sentence of 59 months' imprisonment, concurrent sentences of equal length being imposed on two counts of being concerned in the supply of class A drugs, contrary to section 4(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.

2.

This is his application for an extension of time of 670 days for leave to appeal sentence, that application having been referred directly to us by the Registrar. The only issue raised concerns the application of the credit period for the purposes of section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 in respect of 150 days spent on qualifying curfew. We grant the necessary extension of time and we grant leave.

3.

As is agreed by the prosecution, 75 days should count towards the applicant's sentence under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. To this extent the appeal will be allowed and the sentence amended accordingly.

Epiq Europe Ltd hereby certify that the above is an accurate and complete record of the proceedings or part thereof.

Lower Ground, 18-22 Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS

Tel No: 020 7404 1400

Email: rcj@epiqglobal.co.uk

REGINA v RHYS MORAR

[2022] EWCA Crim 83

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (70.9 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.