WARNING: reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public, in writing, in a broadcast or by means of the internet, including social media. Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached. A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and/or imprisonment. For guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply, and to what information, ask at the court office or take legal advice. |
This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved. |
No. 201904686 B3
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Before:
LORD JUSTICE HADDON-CAVE MRS JUSTICE CARR DBE MR JUSTICE PEPPERALL
REGINA
V
PAUL ROBERT HESSEY
REPORTING RESTRICTIONS APPLY:
THE SEXUAL OFFENCES (AMENDMENT) ACT 1992
__________
Computer-aided Transcript prepared from the Stenographic Notes of Opus 2 International Ltd.
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
5 New Street Square, London, EC4A 3BF
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737
CACD.ACO@opus2.digital
_________
J U D G M E N T
MRS JUSTICE CARR:
On 29 November 2019 in Derby Crown Court the appellant was convicted of nine counts of sexual offending. The provisions of the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 apply to these offences. Under those provisions, where a sexual offence has been committed against a person, no matter relating to that person shall during that person's lifetime be included in any publication if it is likely to lead members of the public to identify that person as the victim of that offence. This prohibition applies unless waived or lifted in accordance with s.3 of the Act.
The appellant appeals his conviction on Count 7, being a count of indecent assault contrary to s.14(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Count 7 was a multiple incident count of indecent assault by the applicant putting his penis in the vagina of the complainant on at least ten occasions. The incidents occurred during the period December 1996 to December 1998 when the complainant was aged 14 or 15. The offending behaving would have been charged as unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 contrary to s.6(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. However, that offence bears a time restriction contained in s.37(2) and para.10 sch.2 of that act: a prosecution for such an offence may not be commenced more than 12 months after the offence charged. That was why the offence was charged with an offence contrary to s.14(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956.
Following the decision in R v J [2004] UKHL 42, the Crown was in fact precluded from prosecuting the appellant for the offence on Count 7 under s.14(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 in such circumstances. Thus, and as the prosecution rightly concedes, Count 7 should never have been on the indictment or allowed to go to the jury.
The appeal will accordingly be allowed to this extent. The conviction on Count 7 will be quashed.
__________
OPUS 2 DIGITAL TRANSCRIPTION
CERTIFICATE
Opus 2 International Limited hereby certifies that the above is an accurate and complete record of the Judgment or part thereof.
Transcribed by Opus 2 International Limited
Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers
New Street Square, London, EC4A 3BF
Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737 CACD.ACO@opus2.digital
This transcript has been approved by the Judge.