Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Singh, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2018] EWCA Civ 3044

Case No: C2/2016/1829
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 3044
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

Before:

LORD JUSTICE LEWISON

Between:

THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF

SINGH Applicant

- and -

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE

HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

(DAR Transcript of WordWave International Ltd trading as DTI

8th Floor, 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 704 1424

Web: www.DTIGlobal.com Email: TTP@dtiglobal.eu

(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

The Applicant did not attend and was not represented

The Respondent did not attend and was not represented

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment

(Approved)

Crown Copyright©

LORD JUSTICE LEWISON:

1.

This is a renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review. The appellant, Mr Singh, is a national of India, who arrived in the United Kingdom illegally and applied to the Secretary of State for the Home Department for indefinite leave to remain. That application was refused and a subsequent attempt to appeal was likewise refused. Nevertheless the appellant made another claim, which he said was a fresh claim. That was considered by the Secretary of State on 13 November 2014. She decided that it was not a fresh claim because all the points that he had raised had in fact been raised in the earlier claim.

2.

Although she was under no obligation to do so, she went on to consider whether the appellant was qualified for indefinite leave to remain, either under the immigration rules themselves or in accordance with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the course of a long and detailed decision letter, she decided that he was not eligible under the rules and that his rights under article 8 were not so interfered with that his return to India would be a breach of his private or family life. He applied to the upper tribunal for permission to apply for judicial review. That came before Upper Tribunal Judge Craig on 10 March 2016. The appellant did not appear on that occasion and, indeed, he has not appeared today. Craig J refused the application on the ground that there was no error of public law in the Secretary of State's evaluation of the case.

3.

The grounds of appeal in support of this appeal do not identify any error of public law, which the Secretary of State is said to have made, rather the appellant disagrees with the Secretary of State's evaluation of the facts of the case. That does not amount to an

error of public law. There is, in my judgment no real prospect of a successful appeal in this case and for that reason I refuse permission to appeal.

Order: Application refused.

Singh, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2018] EWCA Civ 3044

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (122.7 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.