Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Lonergan v Gedling Borough Council

[2009] EWCA Civ 696

Case No: A2 2007/2914
Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWCA Civ 696
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

CHANCERY DIVISION

(MR JUSTICE LEWINSON)

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: Tuesday, 9th June 2009

Before:

SIR ANDREW MORRITT CHC

LORD JUSTICE KEENE

and

LORD JUSTICE ELIAS

Lonergan

Appellant

- and -

Gedling Borough Council

Respondent

(DAR Transcript of

WordWave International Limited

A Merrill Communications Company

190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838

Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

Mr G Blakey (instructed by Messrs Sinclairs) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.

Mr A Chambers (instructed by Messrs Weightmans) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.

Ms N Kleir (instructed by .J E Baring & Co) appeared on behalf of the Interested Party.

Judgment

Sir Andrew Morritt:

1.

The first application with which we have to deal is one made by Mr Blakey, who seeks to appear on behalf of Mrs Lonergan. He is an admitted solicitor, but without the benefit of High Court rights of audience. He applies to us to be permitted to appear on the hearing of this appeal on behalf of Mrs Lonergan, and he has in fact submitted an extensive written argument in support of her appeal. He frankly admitted to us that he had not made any application specifically for the purpose of getting pro bono support from the Bar Council Pro Bono Unit run in conjunction with the Chancery Bar Association; nor had he made any prior application to this court to clarify his status before the appeal was properly called on. A telephone call to my clerk is clearly not adequate for that purpose. In the circumstances, he has effectively presented the court with a pistol to the head, either to give him rights of audience or the appeal might have to go off, or go off partially.

2.

I do not in those circumstances think that it would be appropriate to grant him rights of audience to appear on behalf of Mrs Lonergan. It seems to me that he is the author of her misfortune, and there is no justification for conferring on him rights of audience which he does not have.

3.

I would therefore refuse to confer rights of audience on him.

Lord Justice Keene:

4.

I agree with everything which my Lord has said.

Lord Justice Elias:

5.

So do I.

Order: Application adjourned & application for rights of audience refused

Lonergan v Gedling Borough Council

[2009] EWCA Civ 696

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (86.4 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.