Skip to Main Content
Beta

Help us to improve this service by completing our feedback survey (opens in new tab).

Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Environment Agency & Ors

[2006] EWCA Civ 1138

C1/2005/1014
Neutral Citation Number: [2006] EWCA Civ 1138
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION, ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

(MR JUSTICE LINDSAY)

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London, WC2

Wednesday, 19th July 2006

B E F O R E:

LORD JUSTICE AULD

LORD JUSTICE RIX

LORD JUSTICE MAURICE KAY

THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF EDWARDS

AND PALLIKAROPOULOS

CLAIMANT/APPELLANTS

- v -

THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY & ORS

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT

(DAR Transcript of

Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited

190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838

Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

THE APPELLANTS DID NOT APPEAR AND WERE NOT REPRESENTED.

THE RESPONDENTS DID NOT APPEAR AND WERE NOT REPRESENTED.

J U D G M E N T

1.

LORD JUSTICE AULD: On 26 June 2006 the court dismissed the appellant’s appeal and dismissed the respondent’s appeal on the Respondent’s Notice, and reserved all consequential orders for consideration after receipt of written and, if required by any of the parties, oral submissions. All parties have now made written submissions to the court, and the second appellant and the respondents have notified the court that they are content for it to rule on those submissions without further attendance by them. The first appellant has been notified of the hearing today but has not attended, nor has he sought to make any oral submissions to the court.

2.

In the circumstances the court, having given full consideration to the written submissions, including that of the first appellant, makes the following order:

1.

The respondents shall have 70 per cent of their costs of the proceedings to be paid on the standard basis by the appellants and/or the Legal Services Commission on the following terms:

a)

Seventy per cent of the respondent’s costs incurred up to 1.00pm on 8 February 2006 to be paid by the first appellant and/or the Legal Services Commission. The liability to pay and the amount if any of any costs to be paid by the first appellant to be determined by a costs judge upon application made within three months of the date of this order pursuant to Regulation 10 of the Community Legal Services Costs Regulations 2000;

b)

Seventy per cent of the respondent’s costs incurred from 1.00pm on 8 February 2006 to be paid by the first appellant and/or the Legal Services Commission and by the second appellant in equal shares, the liability of the Legal Services Commission to pay those costs and the amount if any to be paid by the first appellant to be determined by a costs judge on like terms as those relating to the respondent’s costs incurred before 1.00pm on 8 February 2006, and the costs payable by the second appellant not to exceed £2,000.

2.

No order in respect of the interested parties’ costs.

3.

The second appellant’s application for permission to appeal to the House of Lords is refused.

Order: As detailed in judgment.

Edwards & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Environment Agency & Ors

[2006] EWCA Civ 1138

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (78.0 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.