Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Black & Ors v Davies

[2005] EWCA Civ 608

A2/2004/1219
A2/2004/1224
A2/2004/1508
Neutral Citation Number: [2005] EWCA Civ 608
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

(MR JUSTICE BUCKLEY)

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London, WC2

Friday, 6th May 2005

B E F O R E:

LORD JUSTICE WALLER

LORD JUSTICE CARNWATH

SIR MARTIN NOURSE

(1) HERBERT BLACK

(2) AMERICAN IRON & METAL

(3) LITO TRADE INCORPORATED

Claimants/Respondents

-v-

VIVIAN JOHN DAVIES

Defendant/Appellant

(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of

Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited

190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG

Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838

Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

MR IAN MILL QC and MR PUSHPINDER SAINI (instructed by Messrs Denton Wilde Sapte) appeared on behalf of the Appellant

MR CLIVE FREEDMAN QC(instructed by Messrs Teacher Stern Selby) appeared on behalf of the Respondents

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT ON COSTS

1.

LORD JUSTICE WALLER: So far as the costs of the trial are concerned, we think the right order is that there should be no order as to costs, having regard to the findings of dishonest conduct alleged and having regard to the findings of the judge in relation to the evidence given by Mr Davies.

2.

So far as the costs of the appeal are concerned, we think it is right to hive off the interest appeal and that appeal will be dismissed with costs. So far as the costs of the appeal otherwise are concerned, we think that the right order, taking account of the fact that there were issues on which there was success on the respondent's side and having regard to the fact that ground (b) took up a significant amount of the preparation time, is that the Black parties should pay 60% of Mr Davies' costs.

3.

So far as the freezing order is concerned, we do not think it appropriate that we should decide the issue as to whether an application should go ahead for an assessment of damages. That matter should be remitted to a High Court judge. If it was convenient, I would have thought it would be convenient to go to a commercial judge, but that is a matter entirely for the parties.

4.

So far as permission to appeal to the House of Lords is concerned, we refuse permission. It will be a matter for their Lordships.

Black & Ors v Davies

[2005] EWCA Civ 608

Download options

Download this judgment as a PDF (74.3 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download this judgment as XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.