Grange Wine Stores Limited v The Pensions Regulator

Neutral Citation Number[2026] UKFTT 909 (GRC)

View download options

Grange Wine Stores Limited v The Pensions Regulator

Neutral Citation Number[2026] UKFTT 909 (GRC)

Neutral citation number: [2026] UKFTT 00909 (GRC)

Case Reference: FT/PEN/2026/0078

First-tier Tribunal
General Regulatory Chamber

Pensions

Determined on the papers

on 16th June 2026

Decision given on:18th June 2026

Before

HHJ DAVID DIXON

Between

GRANGE WINE STORES LIMITED

Appellant

and

THE PENSIONS REGULATOR

Respondent

Direction: The Appeal is struck out.

DIRECTIONS

Background to Appeal

1.

This appeal seems to concerns a decision of the Pensions Regulator to impose a fine in relation to Pension Act failings. The exact nature of the Appeal is unknown as the decision notice has not been supplied.

2.

The Appellant it seems is an entity required to comply with the provision of pension to its employees and to comply with the requirements of the relevant Act, however again it isn’t clear as the Fixed Penalty Notice has not been complied.

3.

A GRC1 has been provided asserting that no reminders or Notices have been received and as such the penalty is unfair.

4.

Upon receipt of the GRC1 Case Management Directions were supplied to the Appellant indicating that the Appeal application was incomplete and further details were required, including the submission of the decision notice. The CMDs made it clear that a failure to comply with the directions could lead to the proceedings being struck out. The CMDs also indicated that if it was not possible to comply an application to remove any direction was to be made.

5.

No reply has been received, nor an application to explain why the CMDs could not be complied with.

Discussion

6.

As a result of the failure to provide the fixed penalty notice that is assumed to have been issued the Tribunal has no basis to determine that an Appeal lies to the Tribunal nor whether it has any merit.

7.

An appropriate warning was given to the Appellant of what was required and what could happen if there was a failure to comply.

8.

As a result of the failure to comply the Tribunal takes the view that the proceedings should be struck out under Rule 7(2)(c) of the Tribunal Rules. Further, the proceedings would be struck out under:

a.

Rule 8(2)(a) as there is no basis for indicating the Tribunal as jurisdiction;

b.

Rule 8(3)(a) as there is a failure to comply with a direction; and/or

c.

Rule 8(3)(b) as there is is a failure to co-operate with the Tribunal to the degree that it is not possible to deal with the proceedings justly.

9.

Accordingly the proceedings are herein struck out.

(Signed)

HHJ David Dixon

DATE: 16th June 2026

Document download options

Download PDF (102.9 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.