Gergo Horvath v Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency

Neutral Citation Number[2026] UKFTT 102 (GRC)

View download options

Gergo Horvath v Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency

Neutral Citation Number[2026] UKFTT 102 (GRC)

NCN: [2026] UKFTT 00102 (GRC)

Appeal Number: FT/D/2025/1095

First-tier Tribunal
(General Regulatory Chamber)

Determined on the Papers

Notice sent

On: 19 January 2026

26 January 2026

Before

JUDGE O’CONNOR CP

GERGO HORVATH

Appellant

and

DRIVER AND VEHICLE STANDARDS AGENCY

Respondent

Decision: This appeal is struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.

Reasons

1.

The DVSA has made an application to strike out this appeal on the basis that it has no reasonable prospects of success (Footnote: 1). In its application, the DVSA state that the appellant has now undertaken three attempts at the instructional ability and fitness test.

2.

Regulation 14(b) of the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations 2005 states that a trainee licence remains in force until the day immediately following the day on which the holder of the licence failed the instructional ability and fitness test at the third attempt. Accordingly, if the appellant has been unsuccessful in their third attempt at the instructional ability and fitness test, they are not entitled to a further trainee licence, and the appeal to this Tribunal must be dismissed. If the appellant has been successful in their attempt at the instructional ability and fitness test, they are also not entitled to a further trainee licence. This is because a trainee licence may be granted for the purpose of enabling a person to acquire practical experience in giving instruction in motor vehicles with a view to undergoing the instructional and ability fitness test (Footnote: 2). Accordingly, in such circumstances the appeal to this Tribunal must also be dismissed.

3.

By way of Directions dated 16 December 2025, the appellant was provided with an opportunity to make representations as to why the appeal should not be struck out.

4.

The appellant did not respond to the Directions.

5.

In all the circumstances, I accept the DVSA’s statement that the appellant has undertaken a third attempt at the instructional and fitness test and, for the reasons set out above, I conclude that this appeal has no reasonable prospect of success.

Signed

Judge O’Connor CP

Document download options

Download PDF (95.5 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.