
Case Reference: FT/D/2025/0655
Transport
Heard: on the papers in Chambers
Before
TRIBUNAL JUDGE HAZEL OLIVER
Between
MOHIBUR RAHMAN
Appellant
and
REGISTRAR OF APPROVED DRIVING INSTRUCTORS
Respondent
Decision:
1. The proceedings are struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) because there is no reasonable prospect of the Appellant's case, or part of it, succeeding.
REASONS
This is an appeal against a decision of the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors (the “Registrar”) to refuse the Appellant’s application for a third trainee licence.
Under Rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009, the Tribunal may strike out the whole or part of the proceedings if the Tribunal considers there is no reasonable prospect of the appellant's case, or part of it, succeeding.
The Registrar has applied for the appeal to be struck out because it has no reasonable prospects of success. This is because the Appellant has failed their third attempt to pass the instructional ability test on 9 July 2025. A trainee licence remains in force only until the day immediately following the trainee's third unsuccessful attempt at the instructional ability test (regulation 14(b) of the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations 2005).
This application was made on 10 July 2025 and copied to the Appellant. On 10 July 2025 Registrar Bamawo made directions requiring the Appellant to confirm by 25 July 2025 whether the appeal is withdrawn, or to make representations as to why the appeal should not be struck out. The Tribunal has not received any confirmation or representations from the Appellant.
The Registrar cannot grant a trainee licence following a trainee's third unsuccessful attempt at the instructional ability test. Similarly, the Tribunal is not able to do so. This means that the appeal has no reasonable prospect of success.
I therefore strike out the appeal because there is no reasonable prospect of the Appellant's case, or part of it, succeeding.
Signed: Judge Hazel Oliver
Date: 22 August 2025