Skip to Main Content

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions from 2001 onwards

Search results

How to search

Current filter(s)

From date

For example 01 01 2003 or 2003

To date

For example 30 04 2023 or 2023

From specific courts
From specific tribunals

For example a claimant, defendant or other party

For example Smith, or multiple judges: Smith, Jones

2,536 documents found

Results listing

  • Stretchline v H&M (UK) High Court (Chancery Division) [2014] EWHC 3605 (Ch) Matching text sample:

    ...invalidity of the Claimant’s patent relied upon in these proceedings...

    ...goods infringing the Claimant’s patent, UK Patent QB2309038B, relating to tubular... ...2011 in respect of previous patent infringement proceedings brought by the...

    The patent relates to a method for...

    The patent dates from 1996.

  • Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2010] EWCA Civ 33 Matching text sample:

    ...“OD”) of the European Patent Office (“EPO”) had... also held the Patent invalid.

    ...the view that although the patent is of no immediate concern...

    ...there are cases where the patent may have an immediate and...

    ...all the claims of the Patent were invalid on three grounds...

  • Samsung Electronics Co LTD v Apple Retail UK LTD & Anor Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2014] EWCA Civ 250 Matching text sample:

    ...has made to the European Patent Office (the “EPO”)...

    ...appeal, namely EP (UK) Patent No. 1,005, 726... (the “726” patent) and No. 1,714... ,404 (the “404” patent). The action came on... ...Floyd J found that neither patent was entitled to its claimed...

    ...applications in respect of each patent and rejected it, finding... ...it would not render the patent valid. We should also... ...the claims of the 726 patent as granted were independently valid... ...with the claims of this patent (other than claims 1...

    ...in respect of the 726 patent in Germany and in Italy... ...April 2013, the German Federal Patent Court found the patent invalid. Samsung has appealed... both decisions. The 404 patent is in issue in proceedings...

  • IPcom GmbH & Co Kg v Vodafone Group Plc & Ors High Court (Patents Court) [2020] EWHC 132 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...(‘666, or “the Patent”) which is entitled

    The Patent is part of the same... patent family as EP(UK)...

    ...and also infringement of another patent, EP 2 378 735...

    ...trial was that the ‘666 patent will expire on 15 February...

  • Re Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 High Court (Patents Court) [2008] EWHC 1902 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ON APPEAL FROM THE PATENT OFFICE

    ...”) in relation to European Patent (UK) No. 0915894... (“the Patent”) on the basis that... ...not “protected” by the Patent within the meaning of the...

    The application for the Patent was filed by Gilead on...

    ...not protected by a basic patent as required by Article 3...

  • Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd & Anor v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    THE CLAIMANTS AND THE PATENT

    ...the registered proprietor of a patent, EP(UK) 1,441... ,702 B1 (thePatent). The Second Claimant –... ...registered exclusive licensee under the Patent in the UK.

    The Patent

    ...1 and 4 of the Patent, which are set out...

  • GE Healthcare Ltd v Perkinelmer Life Sciences (UK) Ltd & Anor High Court (Patents Court) [2006] EWHC 214 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...action for infringement of European Patent (UK) No 1,007... ...Scintillation Proximity Test” (“the Patent”). The claimant patentee... ...counterclaim for revocation of the Patent or for a declaration that... ...PLI is entitled to the Patent. I will refer to...

    ...primary case is that the Patent is invalid because it lacks... ...step. If, however, the Patent is not invalid on these... ...secondary case is that the Patent rightfully belongs to PLI as...

    The priority date of the Patent is the 18 August 1997...

    The Patent concerns scintillation proximity assay (...

  • GW Pharma Limited & Anor v Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Limited Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [2022] EWCA Civ 1462 Matching text sample:

    ...clause, excluding issues of “patent scope, validity or infringement”...

    ...are fairly common in international patent licences. They are similar...

    ...validity unless and until the patent is finally declared invalid;...

    ...for a licence under a patent claim ultimately held invalid?... ...to this. Everyone knows that patent law can, at least...

  • Nokia OYJ v IPCom GmbH & Co KG High Court (Patents Court) [2013] EWHC 1178 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...interaction between English and European patent dispute tribunals. The two... ...the series of mobile phone patent cases which is currently before...

    The patent in suit in these two... ...of the area of the patent. For further details the...

    ...(“IPCom”) own the patent in suit, having previously... ...proceedings for revocation of the patent and IPCom counterclaimed for infringement... . The patent in suit is (or...

    ...2011 Floyd J held the patent to be valid in an... ...He also determined that the patent in suit in its amended...

  • Regeneron Pharmacueticals Inc v Genentech Inc High Court (Patents Court) [2012] EWHC 657 (Pat) Matching text sample:

    ...applied for revocation of European Patent (UK) No 1 238... 986 (“the patent”), which belongs to... ...of non-infringement of the patent in respect of VTE....

    The patent is concerned with therapeutic agents...

    The validity of the patent is attacked on the grounds...

    The patent