Revitt & Ors v Director of Public Prosecutions

Neutral Citation Number[2006] EWHC 2074 (Admin)

View download options

Revitt & Ors v Director of Public Prosecutions

Neutral Citation Number[2006] EWHC 2074 (Admin)

CO/5226/2006, CO/4737/2006
Neutral Citation Number: [2006] EWHC 2074 (Admin)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice

The Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

Monday 17 July 2006

B e f o r e:

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES

(Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers)

and

MR JUSTICE CRESSWELL

B E T W E E N:

(1) ASHLEY JOSEPH REVITT

(2) LEE MICHAEL BORG

(3) ARRON BARNES

Appellants

- v -

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

Respondent

Computer Aided Transcription by

Smith Bernal, 190 Fleet Street, London EC4

Telephone No: 020 7421 4040

(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

MR SIMON DAVIS (instructed by Sheppards Solicitors Limited

Stafford) appeared on behalf of THE THREE APPELLANTS

THE RESPONDENT was not represented

J U D G M E N T

Monday 17 July 2006

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: Mr Davis, we think the appropriate course is to adjourn this appeal so that the Crown Prosecution Service can be represented to deal with the issues of principle that arise. In particular, if it is to be said that a point is reached at which someone charged with a criminal offence has been proved guilty according to law at a stage prior to the conclusion of the proceedings, what are the principles that apply so as to satisfy that test?

MR DAVIS: My Lord, yes. I would be very grateful to be able to expand on the skeleton argument to address that issue.

THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE: Yes. We will see if we can get this brought back this term, but it may be difficult. But we will adjourn on that basis.

Document download options

Download PDF (76.7 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.