Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Transport

Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWCA Civ 697

View download options

Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Transport

Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWCA Civ 697

Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EWCA Civ 697
Case No: CA-2025-003267
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

KING'S BENCH DIVISION

PLANNING COURT

Mrs Justice Lang

[2025] EWHC 3206 (Admin)

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 02/06/2026

Before :

LORD JUSTICE BEAN, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, CIVIL DIVISION

LORD JUSTICE LEWISON
and

LORD JUSTICE HOLGATE

Between :

THE KING (on the application of Luton and District Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise)

Appellant

- and -

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT

- and –

LONDON LUTON AIRPORT LIMITED

Respondent

Interested

Party

Estelle Dehon KC, Ruchi Parekh and Hannah Taylor (instructed by Leigh Day)

for the Appellant

James Strachan KC and Victoria Hutton (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Respondent

Michael Humphries KC and Rebecca Clutten (instructed by Broadfield Law UK LLP)

for the Interested Party

Hearing date : 19 May 2026

Supplemental Judgment

Lord Justice Bean (Vice President, Court of Appeal, Civil Division), Lord Justice Lewison and Lord Justice Holgate:

1.

The Claimant applied to this court for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court (“UKSC”) from our judgment and order handed down on 21 May: [2026] EWCA Civ 648 . We refused that application. Our reasons are as follows.

2.

We respectfully agree with the view of the UKSC, set out in Practice Direction 1 at paragraph 1.31, that on a proper interpretation of Lane v Esdaile [1891] AC 210 the UKSC has no jurisdiction to hear appeals from preliminary decisions of the Court of Appeal in respect of a case in which permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is not granted. We note that the wording used is that permission is “not granted”, rather than that permission is “refused”; so that even if it were correct that this court had no jurisdiction to refuse permission to appeal having refused an extension of time, the result would still be the same.

3.

In any event, if the UKSC does have jurisdiction, we are not persuaded that the grounds of appeal against the refusal to extend time raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the UKSC.

Document download options

Download PDF (87.8 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.