Skip to Main Content
The National Archives home page

Find Case LawBeta

Judgments and decisions since 2001

Jerome Young v The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Wandsworth

Neutral Citation Number [2025] EWCA Civ 1209

Jerome Young v The Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Wandsworth

Neutral Citation Number [2025] EWCA Civ 1209

Neutral Citation: [2025] EWCA Civ 1209
Case No: CA-2025-000320
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT

HHJ SAGGERSON

H00WT502

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

Date: 31 July 2025

Before:

LORD JUSTICE NUGEE

Between:

JEROME YOUNG

(by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)

Defendant/Appellant

- and -

THE MAYOR & BURGESSES OF THE

LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH

Claimant/Respondent

MR DANIEL GRUTTERS (instructed by Morrison Spowart Solicitors)

appeared for the Defendant / Appellant

MR LINDSAY JOHNSON (instructed by South London Legal Partnership)

appeared for the Claimant / Respondent

APPROVED JUDGMENT

If this Transcript is to be reported or published, there is a requirement to ensure that no reporting restriction will be breached. This is particularly important in relation to any case involving a sexual offence, where the victim is guaranteed lifetime anonymity (Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992), or where an order has been made in relation to a young person.

This Transcript is Crown Copyright.  It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority.  All rights are reserved.

Digital Transcription by Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd

2nd Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP

Tel No: 020 7067 2900. DX: 410 LDE

Email: info@martenwalshcherer.com

Web: www.martenwalshcherer.com

LORD JUSTICE NUGEE:

1.

With considerable misgiving, I am going to give you permission to appeal, Mr Grutters. I think you have persuaded me that this legislation, which is notoriously difficult to apply, is sufficiently unclear that local authorities up and down the country really ought to know when and in what circumstances they have to tell clients that they are entitled to reviews. I do accept that it is at least possible that a review by the local authority is rather different from a decision by a district judge.

2.

It does not mean that I have actually changed any of the views I expressed in the order I made previously but I am persuaded that the contrary is sufficiently arguable to allow you to take it forward to a full appeal without, I have to say, very much encouragement to believe that you will succeed. However, I think you should have the opportunity to try to persuade three of my colleagues that my views are wrong.

3.

So I will give you permission to appeal. I will continue the stay until determination of the appeal. I suggest it be listed for a day.

----------------

(This Judgment has been approved by the Judge.)

Digital Transcription by Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd

2nd Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP

Tel No: 020 7067 2900. DX: 410 LDE

Email: info@martenwalshcherer.com

Web: www.martenwalshcherer.com

Document download options

Download PDF (114.0 KB)

The original format of the judgment as handed down by the court, for printing and downloading.

Download XML

The judgment in machine-readable LegalDocML format for developers, data scientists and researchers.